Completely normal tribunal in the UK

submitted by jet199 from (i.imgur.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The denial of biological reality is funny at first glance, but then you think about it some more and start to realize just how horrifying it actually is.

[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Soon judges won't know what the meaning of "is" is, and everyone will be blinded by perpetual confusion, unable to think a single clear thought. Or that's what some social engineers seem to want to happen.

Lots of people see what what is going on, and aren't putting up with it.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

In my more cynical moments, I'm halfway to believing that the whole TRA push is just a massive psyop designed to train people. If they can be trained to accept such an obvious lie as men can be women (and vice versa) in the face of all evidence to the contrary, then they'll accept other lies just as big and obvious.

[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

...I mean, they did say no binaria and no binario, which is kind of fair to use for important things (no binaria for enby-affiliated women, binario for enby-affiliated men), so there COULD be a kernel of sanity there.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think that was more pointing out the insanity of applying non-binary nonsense to a language that has a gender distinction for applying non-binary nonsense.