Museum reclassifies Roman emperor as trans woman

submitted by artetolife from bbc.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]clownworlddropout 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

See guys? Preferred pronouns aren't a new thing! Totally not a new made-up bullshit thing guys! 🙄

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Now now let's not impose the colonizer anglo pronouns on this proud oppressed latin person or emperor.

Let's see what his actual preferred pronouns would have been in Latin.

Oh would you look at that Latin didn't have third person personal pronouns. Oops.

[–]ID10T 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Is there an official logical fallacy for arguing that some type of nonsense is legit because people believed in it a long time ago?

[–]clownworlddropout 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Argumentum ad antiquitatem: an appeal to antiquity

[–]ID10T 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks! I literally just looked that up. I love a good logical fallacy.