you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Clown_Chan 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (8 children)

Absolutely based Queens.😻🫶

That's why I lurk there.

[–]bucetao6969Ace Spectrum 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (6 children)

Feminazi breeding hellscape

[–]Clown_Chan 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Well, I prefer being "feminazi" than dick-worshipper 🧐

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yea, don't be like queenbread

[–]bucetao6969Ace Spectrum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

you don't need to be one or the other.

Also, women are free to be dick-worshippers. I thought feminism gave them the choice to do so if they wanted?

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If we define feminism as "women should be free to make their own choices" which is barely feminism and more just general equality which is not controversial these days.

Feminism routinely took the more critical approach of constantly reinventing itself and finding new ways for women to be depressed, they'll call it Marxism in the right wing media, they are sort of right, since many marxists do the same critical approach to finding infinite oppression. In reality though the problem is one of selfish promotion. Finding negative reasons as to why you should be given special considerations rather than finding ways that you can further contribute to society, or even to yourself.

As such be it now or the past you'll see the same kind of people drawn to the radical sides of these things, people that just hate life and are generally unpleasant to be around. These sorts of rad fems will rail on women who chose to live as housewives and raise children and will say that it's because they are against their oppression, but in reality they just hate that other people are happy.

You'll see similar types of people in the "trad wife movement" though when it goes off the rails. Very bitter women unhappy with their marriage will rail on those women who choose to focus on career instead because they are unhappy with other people's success.

Ultimately the problem comes down to simply being unhappy with yourself and choosing to take that out by trying to make other people share in your misery rather than doing anything to improve your own situation. It's far easier to go around seething and criticizing others than it is to make substantial changes to your own life.

People are all unequal to everyone else in some way. For good or for bad everyone is different. There will always be a way to pity your own plight in the universe should you wish to take a critical eye and think about yourself negatively. The observation may even be true, but it does nothing to actually improve your situation in and of itself.

[–]bucetao6969Ace Spectrum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Good comment but

If we define feminism as "women should be free to make their own choices" which is barely feminism and more just general equality which is not controversial these days.

This was what feminism was back in the day. After they got their rights and privileges (such as voting without drafting) I guess they had to change.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The history of women's rights is far more complicated than the simple story of "women used to have no rights, they fought for them, and won, now they have rights".

Rather it is a pretty complex issue varying greatly from country to country and from time to time and culture to culture. Suffrage is an interesting topic to breach as indeed women were often not granted suffrage rights, but the very ideas of universal suffrage are fairly recent in and of themselves. Since it was very uncommon in historical democracies that the right to vote would be extended to all men, often it was limited only to the highest social strata.

There really isn't much in our modern society from a legal standpoint where women need to fight for equal rights under the law but you'll still have the women that have some kind of chip on their shoulder or persecution complex or hero complex or whatever, that seems to have this innate need to jump into and join a fight for equality where the battles have mostly already been won and there isn't that much left to do, but when it comes to activists there is always more to do, it is never enough, and the fight must continue forever, so they'll slowly be given over to the most zealous members and focus on less and less important issues.

That's why you saw them using the wage gap as it is so called as their main issue a few years back, there's little else to tackle, the obstacles remaining in women's loves towards true statistical equality with men are not such things which can be easily removed. The simple fact that childbirth for example puts a much larger physical burden on the woman than the man means that women statistically as a whole will never perform economically as well as the entire body of men statistically as a whole. But so long as the woman is free to make her own life choices and forgo childbirth to pursue career or forgo career to pursue family what is the problem?

I think a lot of the problem is people are angry that world is unfair, and yes, it is unfair, and it doesn't mean we should just throw out hands up about it and do nothing. But it will always be unfair because everyone, every situation, it's all different. Subtlety or majorly. It's much like with having a disability. We should do reasonable things to try to make life easier for people with disabilities and allow them to integrate into society, but it doesn't change the fact that simply having a disability is going to limit you. No blind person can ever be a bus driver. I think some women once they realize their own limitations become very angry and instead of accepting it and working around it, they try to fight reality instead. It's one thing to change laws to better accommodate you, but while it's easy to simply allow women to do things like vote or own property, no stroke of a pen is going to change the fundamental reality of our natural existence. You can't legislate that men have periods too for fairness sake.

[–]slavdude0 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Only thing based are troons in your spaces LMAO.