TRANSGENDERWhat happened to respecting her pronouns? - *Man*, who is also known as “Amy”, is in court for being a dirty, kidnapping “female-identifying” nonce. BBC seems to have changed their diversity and inclusion rules for reporting the news.

submitted by ClassroomPast6178 from bbc.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

I've always just written down "your majesty" and "master" as my preferred pronouns. Then I file harassment charges when people refuse to use them.

My gender identity is "royalty" and it you don't respect my identity then banish you from the realm.

[–]OuroborosTheory 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

funny how quickly they flip to "you're just making a mockery of people who sincerely believe they're a term popularized by Undertale!"

and yet it'd be so EASY to say that the unshaven convicted rapist is just a typical CisHet threatening females--after all, isn't that why they say they can never be in the men's rooms? because the males could DO something to them at any moment?

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

How dare you. How dare you.

This man is very clearly a woman. Because he said he's a woman. This means that women are a threat to women. And women should be banned from women's restrooms immediately. To protect women.

It is the utmost feminist ideal to protect women from the predations of the patriarchy even if the victimizers are traditionally enpinsed women themselves. So the ultimate fuck you to the patriarchy is to ban women's restrooms entirely. So women are freed from the patriarchal oppression of societal responsibilities and are free to pursue their dreams of domestic sandwich production.

[–]OuroborosTheory 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

it's the cotton ceiling all over again! (it means underwear, which some women aren't letting me into!)

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

If we allow women to wear clothing then they can have pockets. If they have pockets then they can carry money. And if they can carry money then they can "shudder" earn profit.

Clothing is the patriarichal capitalist system of oppression.