you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ClassroomPast6178 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I think they have been allowed to cross boundaries because people are too worried to call them out - which is exactly the kind of circumstance that leads to breaches in child safeguarding. Child safeguarding is literally built on a foundation of “if you think something is off, fucking report it”, in the schools I’ve worked at you would never get in trouble for reporting something as long as you followed the correct procedures and policies and yes, I’d report this guy as what he allowed might meet the criteria for child abuse (exposing children to sexual acts - buying or giving an under-18 a sex toy is abuse you freaks) in the UK. I say might only because I don’t know if it’s been tested in court yet, but I think handing around buttplugs and discussing dildos would constitute abuse.

[–]notafed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The way things are going, the reporter would likely be charged with some sort of hate crime.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's the thing, surely this violates some law. Like if I'm under 18 I don't think the sex shop is legally able to sell me a dildo are they? But it's ok if some guy just gives it away to the kids?

It might just be a legal blindspot. Maybe? I can't imagine anyone thought to codify "thou shalt not distribute sex toys in highschool".