you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FlyingKangaroo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The idea of “asexuality” as an orientation and people unironically saying such shit is what damaged the real people without need for sex. It’s sad to see they will be perceived through the image created by the hypersexual queer crowd.

Also the topic of sexuality outside anything related to it, like creating a relationship, is totally pointless and unnecessary. But without screaming about their preferences, queers wouldn’t be themselves after all.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

the real people without need for sex.

We call them women.

[–]FlyingKangaroo 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Some women would disagree :P I get the joke though