all 28 comments

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/arcade-fire-sexual-misconduct-allegations_n_630b0664e4b0dc23bbe9522f

The outlet reports that three women who said they had sexual interactions with Butler between 2016 and 2020 came to feel the interactions “were inappropriate given the gaps in age, power dynamics, and context in which they occurred.”

Slut regret is not a valid complaint.

[–]Datachost 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

I've just read through the Pitchfork article and it seems like the worst he did was send dick pics without consent. That isn't really on, that's a little shitty of him, but probably also not worth him losing his career over. The rest of it seems like a lot of he said she said, especially with the first girl, where apparently he stuck his hand in her trousers, or maybe it was above her trousers, she can't really remember. Is going after 18-21 year olds when you're over 35 a little skeevy? Yeah, a little. Personally, I wouldn't do it and I'm not even 30. But where do you draw the line there? Conor Oberst is over 40 and going after women in the 25-30 range and he's even had trouble in the past with accusations against him (accusations that were pure bullshit).

It feels like there have been a few musicians and entertainers recently whose worst crime has been being a shitty boyfriend/sexual partner. If that's where you want to draw your line, that's your choice.

[–]LyingSpirit472 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

It feels like there have been a few musicians and entertainers recently whose worst crime has been being a shitty boyfriend/sexual partner. If that's where you want to draw your line, that's your choice.

Honestly, that's been a problem with #MeToo and #TimesUp, where it keeps the Harvey Weinsteins of the world on the same level as, say, the Aziz Ansaris of "they described a bad date" or the Dustin Hoffmans of "he once hit on me, I said no, and he went about his day".

[–]Datachost 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Exactly. I felt similar with Gus Johnson. Sounds like he was a shitty boyfriend, certainly. But that also sounds like something that should stay between him and his ex. Ansari sounds like he's kind of a clumsy lover, but he's not a rapist. I said earlier today that humanity seems to have a problem finding the middle ground and this situation just feels like another case of that. People shouldn't feel like they need to be silent over being victims of actual crimes. But at the same time, don't air your dirty laundry, relationship drama should probably stay between you and the other person, unless what your ex did was actually criminal.

[–]LyingSpirit472 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Exactly. If anything, things like those are closer to "this famous person I met on Tinder wasn't the knight in shining armor who'd ride in on a white horse and save me from my humdrum existence so I'd live happily ever after, and I want revenge!" explains it all, and makes them insidious clout-chasers who are ruining a serious issue so they can try to be famous.

[–]RuinedSpiral[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is actually a really good articulation of this idea.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

the Harvey Weinsteins of the world on the same level

Dude was definitely a creep but to quote him, it's not like he invented the casting couch.

[–]LyingSpirit472 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

And even if he didn't invent the casting couch, there's a world of difference between a serial predator and a bad date or someone who you're not interested in showing interest in you, then politely going away after you make it clear you're not interested.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm not arguing he's a good guy, but I think a lot of those women knew what they were getting in to. And when I consider the benefit of a film role for letting someone go down on you (not the only thing but a recurring complaint) or even fucking them, and considering most people fuck for nothing at all, it doesn't seem good, but it does seem somewhat understandable.

My shitty landlords want to charge pet rent, and I don't know if you know this about Gizmo, but he doesn't have an income. I could use a cushy film role. Lemme know if you or u/jet199 know any gay Weinstein types.

[–]LyingSpirit472 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

...you don't seem to get what I'm saying here- good, bad, or otherwise, what Weinstein did is decidedly far, far, far worse than "one time there was a bad date" or "one time this person hit on me and I wasn't interested, then they left me alone".

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just don't see how that applies, the women came to him, he wasn't chasing anyone. When it's an open secret Weinstein is a womanizer who expects sexual favors for roles and they go to him anyways, well, you play with fire, you get burned.

far worse than "one time there was a bad date" or "one time this person hit on me and I wasn't interested, then they left me alone".

That's generic dating advice, and neither of those things are bad at all, that's just part of dating. There's a difference between pestering a woman who is clearly not interested, and well, everything else.

You ever watch those old Bond movies where the love interest says no and struggles, but Bond persists until she gives in and likes it?

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

He's a violent thug who was well known for throwing punches at work.

I have no doubt he was violent to women too, not casting couch style manipulation.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

He did look like a mob enforcer. I'm certain he was a total piece of shit, it's just the accusers often seemed complicit in exchanging sex-for-work. The victim list reads like a who's who of untalented actresses. It was an open secret what was going on, it was joked about in public. The women largely just don't seem like innocent victims to me.

Speaking of Weinstein being a piece of shit, I heard in Mallrats he was going to scrub the film if Joey Lauren Adams, Kevin Smith's gf or perhaps ex at the time, didn't show her tits. And nobody liked that ultimatum. Her career didn't end there but it sure fizzled out. The last role she was nominated for anything was Big Daddy.

That bothers me more than a woman going up to his hotel room and whatever happening in order to get a role. That's Adams only topless scene in her entire filmography.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think it's reasonable to assume a man like Weinstein had innocent victims and not so innocent ones. And that the more opportunistic women are probably a lot more likely to have gone public and try to cash in.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's an excellent point, I'd feel differently if a different sort of woman spoke up against Weinstein.

[–]RuinedSpiral[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I’m pretty much right there with you. I’m about to hit my mid 30s myself and wouldn’t dream of having a sexual or romantic relationship with someone 18-21 years or age, but at the same time, I do believe that people that age have the ability to consent to relationships with people older than that age. I do think there’s an issue with people equating an incompatible or unsatisfying relationship with abuse though, as we have seen many times that unfounded accusations can really ruin someone’s life.

[–]Datachost 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Right, at the end of the day the age of consent is where it is. I'm going to find it a little weird if you're dating someone half your age and if I know you personally I'm going to make that known. But ultimately, I'm not going to call for anyone to lose their livelihood over it.

There's definitely a degree of people fostering audiences that go on to cancel them and it is hard not to say "I told you so". It's like the whole Lindsay Ellis thing, would I personally have stopped watching her videos over what she did? No, I never really watched them in the first place, but that certainly wouldn't have been the straw that broke the camel's back. Butler's transgressions certainly seem to be worse than Ellis', but even then at worst he seems to have been kind of a scumbag. Everyone can choose the art they consume and which artists they choose to endorse, but I think outside of outright violent or sexual crime I don't really care too much what artists get up to in their private lives. I'm especially growing fed up of ex partners airing their dirty laundry in the form of exposes. What's that, he was kind of absent emotionally? You don't say, the dude's whole image is based on being a tortured soul. If I had to stop listening to any musician who had substance abuse issues or a sketchy relationship history, or whose political views didn't line up with mine (in either direction) I'd run out of good musicians pretty quickly.

[–]RuinedSpiral[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well said. If we held a lot of musicians of the past, or even the present, to the standards Butler is currently being held to, there would be very little left to listen to if their behavior made us stop listening to them.

[–]Datachost 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's also a difference between "This goes against my personal morals, that's why I'm not a fan of theirs anymore" and "This goes against my personal morals, that's why you're not allowed to be a fan of theirs anymore".

Funeral is a good album and this situation isn't going to make me stop listening to it. And that goes in the opposite direction too, Big Thief can be insufferably woke off stage, but they're five for five in six years for great albums.

[–]alladd 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

it would be nice if pitchfork would take some responsibility for their role in potentially destroying artists' careers with these articles. they basically ruined the pinegrove guy's reputation only for it to turn out months after the "allegations" came out that the dude had just asked a girl to cheat on her partner, and she did, and bore none of the consequences for it, while he got called a rapist.

i mean this right here is suspicious as hell:

A fourth person, who is gender-fluid and uses they/them pronouns, claims that Butler sexually assaulted them twice in 2015, when they were 21 and he was 34: Once while they were riding together in a car, and again after he allegedly showed up at their apartment despite text messages admonishing him not to come.

so to clarify: she texted Win not to come over, and he did, and then...she let him in.

the next girl, Lily, is the same. she had a partner, yet agreed to go on multiple dates with him. something sexual definitely happened, but instead of focusing on the fact she willingly cheated, they focus on the deniable/unprovable aspects of those encounters to make it seem like he holds all the blame.

the others sent nude photos willingly, but now they claim they were pressured or something.

methinks they just regret it lol. and the fact that we KNOW there are little bottom-feeder lawyers trying to take down big name artists with shit like this makes it highly suspect.

[–]Datachost 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Pretty sure Pitchfork were involved in the Conor Oberst shitshow too.

[–]alladd 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

it's truly disgusting how click-based ad revenue streams have literally debased all press to the level of muckrackers. pride, prestige, quality - all irrelevant because you get paid the same per click no matter what the content is.

[–]Datachost 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Pitchfork have some issues beyond that for me, though they are symptomatic of the same problems. In days gone by they filled a niche, it felt like they often reviewed musicians others hadn't yet heard of, or that they could often be a platform to help artists breakthrough from being well known in their local scene into the mainstream(ish). But then they realised reviewing the latest Beyonce album got them more clicks. They started to go downhill pretty quickly after the Conde Nast move.

But yeah, publications like them are often too happy to just throw out whatever shit based on rumours, then hide behind "We were just going off whatever information we had at the time" when it turns out to be bullshit. I still don't know why Conor Oberst especially didn't go after some of the publications that attacked him. Because that was a particularly ridiculous case, it wasn't only that he hadn't done anything, he hadn't ever been in the same room as this woman and she turned out to have some pretty bad mental issues. That's the kind of shit they should have been able to find out with even the slightest investigation

[–]alladd 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

investigation eats away at their bottom line. conde nast helped feed that mentality - everything comes down to getting the most clicks with the least effort. but really it's been going on for a while now; all these indie publications that could thrive in the earlier years of the internet have succumbed to the pressure to stay afloat and publishing and that means no more obscure coverage, no more in-depth writing, no more thinking.

[–]RuinedSpiral[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is a lot to be said here about how this all relates to woke capitalism and the commercial takeover of the internet that I don’t think I could properly articulate with writing a long, long essay.

[–]RuinedSpiral[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pitchfork has sucked for a long time. The move from catering to more underground tastes to this more poptimist thing is probably the most clear shift demonstrating this. Honestly, I had forgotten about the Condé Nast thing but that probably had a lot to do with it. Even before that though, they had an annoying habit of embracing softer, kind of twee leaning indie pop bands (like the Arcade Fire, ironically enough) while dismissing harder and heavier more underground bands, which always kind of bothered me but one could say that’s a matter of personal taste more than anything. All of this being said though, I didn’t think they’d devolve to the point where they’re relying on cancel culture hit pieces for clicks.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I'm so out of it when it involves popular music. I looked at the artists who were nominated for VMAs this past weekend & only recognized Nicki Manaj, Taylor Swift, BTS, & Lizzo. And I'm not familiar with any of their music. Lizzo wore an interesting tent-like structure on the red carpet. That crazy-ass dress was so oversized I expected all the BTS boys to emerge from it, sort of like a Lizzo Clown Car. Now that would have been fun.

[–]Datachost 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All you need to know is that Billy Strings is currently one of the best guitar players around. And you kind of have to be to call yourself Billy Strings.