Wikipedia is now redacting information anytime anyone writes out the birth names of any transgender people, even in the so-called “discussion pages” to discuss article content… but no, this ISN’T a nu-religious movement...

submitted by loubag1997 from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AkbarZip 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Wikipedia editor here. I've noticed how they've bowed to gender ideology. Nothing you can really do about it.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Cross that source off the list, twice. Time to build an alternative internet: based net.

[–]RedEyedWarriorThe Evil Cishomo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I guess you could use Info Galactic as an alternative, even though I'm not so sure what their record is.

[–]AkbarZip 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No other online source of info comes close. Wikipedia will change when the tide of public opinion turns against gender ideology. In the meantime all that can be done is make it somewhat less biased.

[–]RedEyedWarriorThe Evil Cishomo 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Keep dreaming. I don't expext Wikipedia to change. Wikipedia has been pushing the transgender ideology since 2009 at the earliest. And even if Wikipedia is swayed by public opinion, it is based in San Francisco, one of the most neoliberal cities on earth. So it won't be changing for a long time at least.