Wikipedia is now redacting information anytime anyone writes out the birth names of any transgender people, even in the so-called “discussion pages” to discuss article content… but no, this ISN’T a nu-religious movement...

submitted by loubag1997 from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Datachost 26 insightful - 5 fun26 insightful - 4 fun27 insightful - 5 fun -  (6 children)

That's the idea. A paedophile in Wisconsin just tried arguing in front of court that having to go on the sex offender's register would be a violation of his human rights, because ot would be deadnaming him. It got shot down in a 3-4 decision. Three Wisconsin Supreme Court justices fucking agreed with him

[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

As if it was bad enough for tranny sex offenders to be housed in women's prison.

[–]GrilledTofuIdentifying as a block of tofu 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just when I thought reality couldn't be more like a Babylon Bee article, they proved me wrong....

[–]RedEyedWarriorThe Evil Cishomo 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Three court justices. Western civilisation is in deep trouble.

[–]Smarterthanlastweek2 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How the fuck did it get to this point? Was everyone not paying fucking attention or something?

[–]RedEyedWarriorThe Evil Cishomo 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most people don't pay attention.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just put both names on the Sex-Offender register then. How is this controversial?