SANITYNYT Publishes a Gender Critical Article

submitted by xoenix from nytimes.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]raven9 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

Id like to know What kind of sick mentality ever declared that killing babies is a womans right in the first place. That's the part I don't get. Have you ever searched google images for "aborted foetus"? Second trimester abortions are not a bunch of cells. They are brutally murdered tiny people with tiny hands and fingers and they feel pain while they are torn apart by the abortionists tools.

[–]LyingSpirit472 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The answer- abortion rights became an all or nothing thing. Even saying "it's a medical procedure and the procedure should be legal, if only for the no doubt about it 'the mother will die in childbirth, and the fetus is dead. It's dead, it'll be born dead. There's no heartbeat, no brainwaves...if you believe in a soul, it has no soul. Oh, and by the same rules/Bible reading the religious people claim it's evil to have the procedure be legal, the second it gets born and is instantly pronounced dead, it won't have had a chance to accept Jesus Christ as its lord and savior during its technical millisecond 'life', meaning the fetus will be condemned to burn in Hell for all eternity if you force it to be carried to term' is somehow not enough for either side. On the pro-choice side you have to have "nope, anything, even if it's a whim, have random abortions to people at will no matter what", and the pro-life side would respond to that example as '...well, if the baby's born dead, it'll just become an angel and sit on a cloud and look at Jesus all day, while the worthless whore who should've kept their legs closed gets the punishment they deserve.'

[–]r2d2_21 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

nope, anything, even if it's a whim, have random abortions to people at will no matter what

The way I see it, if you allow one kind of abortion you have to allow all kinds of it. If you start to police who gets an abortion and who doesn't, eventually you'll have legitimate cases being denied the procedure and risking their lives, and in the end it would turn to the same as banning all abortions.

[–]LyingSpirit472 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly. Ultimately, it is the issue- you have to allow it all or you have to allow none of it...and considering it's ultimately a medical procedure and needs to be legal on that alone, you have to defer to "allow it all."