Not only are the "sources" for my claims on this very thread and asserted by the creator herself (and myself - a mod); but what you find meaningful (i.e. having merit) is irrelevant to what is actually the case, which is the "sub" not being intended for debate purposes that diminish the quality of the website and distract from it's goal.

You appear lost, my friend. Your bizarre Dunning–Krugerian display is not even relevant to the discussion itself, because not only did you not apprehend or analyze my post, because if you did you would would've known I already covered this very comment in detail, but claiming that an owned webpage must accommodate and support content irrelevant to the sites intended purpose at the expense of quality and optimization for it's members is not only insane, but servers as an active demonstration as to why the site will operate as it will.