you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]tomatosplat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The 'renewable resources' are less than half the problem.

Under governor "KING RICHARD" virtually all companies providing natural gas to new housing subdivisions had no checks or balances on delivery systems to subdivisions.

16 gw of failure is do to wind farms delivery, less than half of that is attributed to the windmill itself. Windmill energy is relatively new, and will fail, untill viscosity of lubrication is perfected. (Petroleum) this does not mean that this means should be abandoned.

Denmark has done the same thing, except that their mills are driven by sea currents. They have the same mills, but undersea. Theirs doesnt freeze, but if a turbine fails, it is extremely expensive.

I dont have an agenda, I'm just providing o formation.

16.2 gW ' have been lost because of wind.

31.2gW ' have been lost because of EPA regulations on coal or natural gas burning plants.

Edit" if you need sources: I will provide:means y p.oo u haven't been pay ok ng attention. And I'm sorry for you.