you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit 23 insightful - 2 fun23 insightful - 1 fun24 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

You were making really good arguments that had no answer. And you were using the trans' own logic to do so.

[–]bopomofodojo 22 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

And this is exactly why it was banned. Their ideology has no logical consistency, only cult-like mantras. Any debate very clearly demonstrates their inconsistency and nonsensical beliefs, so it must be shut down immediately. And the logic-back-on-them just shows how weak the arguments are. The funny thing was how many TRAs saying "omg this satire is so offensive" and I'm thinking "what satire? this is literally what you say". And not to mention the blatant gaslighting, replying to a tweet with 100k likes that "no one thinks this". So absurd.

[–]Chipit 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

It's not a contradiction. They really do think like this.

It is not, as many think, a fear of being exposed as fraudulent or illegitimate—or otherwise of losing the debate or looking bad in the challenging conversation—that prevents those who have internalized a significant amount of the Critical Social Justice Theory mindset that prevents these sorts of things from happening. There’s a mountain of Theoretical reasons that they would avoid all such activities, and even if those are mere rationalizations of a more straightforward fear of being exposed as fraudulent or losing, they are shockingly well-developed and consistent rationalizations that deserve proper consideration and full explanation.

There are a number of points within Critical Social Justice Theory that would see having a debate or conversation with people of opposing views as unacceptable, and they all combine to create a mindset where that wouldn’t be something that adherents to the Theory are likely or even willing to do in general. This reticence, if not unwillingness, to converse with anyone who disagrees actually has a few pretty deep reasons behind it, and they’re interrelated but not quite the same. They combine, however, to produce the first thing everyone needs to understand about this ideology: it is a complete worldview with its own ethics, epistemology, and morality, and theirs is not the same worldview the rest of us use.

Read more: https://newdiscourses.com/2020/07/woke-wont-debate-you-heres-why/

[–]bopomofodojo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thank you for this, I'm into part 2 and it's really fascinating. Definitely a "this person articulates what I've been thinking"!

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

IPlease share this link on all your social media. It needs to become common knowledge!

Repeated for your convenience:

https://newdiscourses.com/2020/07/woke-wont-debate-you-heres-why/