Migrants banned from Finnish schools and daycare centers after multiple child rape cases

submitted by SundogsPlace from (voiceofeurope.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SundogsPlace[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The article is about a 'migrant integration program' that was cancelled due to parents having strong concerns that it was directly connected to the increase in rapes of their children.

So while migrants are the focal point of the story, and thus by extension could be considered 'designed to fuel arguments against migrants', but I don't know how else you could write the story without them as a focal point.

Usually news reports on such violent crime is focused more so on the perpetrator, than the victim. But hey, okay.

So, I guess we're exemplifying two different mind outsets on how to view this wizzwizz4.

How would you characterize, or portray this article more correctly? Because, I see large groups of refugees are no longer allowed to visit schools; which could by way of a thesaurus be considered 'banned'.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

  • They're allowed to visit schools. They're no longer invited to visit schools.
  • The article implies that the group of immigrants has a higher rape incidence than the group of non-immigrants, but I've never seen any evidence to support that. In fact, there probably isn't any.
  • This isn't a report on violent crime.

Address these points please.

[–]SundogsPlace[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

point 1: Groups of migrants organized by the govt., and sent into schools has been banned by parents concerned for their children's safety. The article didn't reference individuals.

point 2: Well, when there are patterns, people notice them more so now than ever before, due to continually seeing the subversion instituted by govt., and media. Should you ignore a pattern? There was obviously enough of a pattern, that the people got their way, or do they deserve communal punishment?

is point 3 even a point? It's a bullet, but no, the article didn't address a single violent crime, they addressed a solution that patterning forced. It's pathetic that common folk have to look at 'patterns' anymore, but it's the fact, and if you really do study up, you'll see it's actually a fairly common talking point.

And that link you provided, I honestly haven't ever heard of them; I suspect that could be because the site is apparently more so for coding, and web development stuff? Interesting you'd attain facts from such an obscure place.

Well, I did one better, I used google, now over the last several years, I've seen google, and youtube both hide, push down, and bring up more favorable hits; they openly do this now, as part of our new radical paradigm of integration into communism... You know comrade... But, I digress

So as it stands today, and no further dates in the future, Google backs up the premise of undocumented illegal, and unchecked 'rapefugees' for multiple reasons being the source, and there's even a link to 'teaching migrants how to behave'..https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=H6RgXOvKJZ6t0PEPtd2GgAg&q=Finland+rape+uptick+corresponds+with+migrants&btnK=Google+Search&oq=Finland+rape+uptick+corresponds+with+migrants&gs_l=psy-ab.3...9527.22294..22331...8.0..0.96.3827.54......0....1..gws-wiz.....0..0i131j0j0i22i30.hDBH02BpqPM

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

  1. The article says, right there in the title, "migrants banned". This says that the individuals are banned; otherwise it would be "migrant visit programme banned" or something.
  2. Are there patterns, or just patterns in reporting? Because many, many rape cases go unreported. The ordinary is never news, unless there's an ulterior motive.

  3. You said:

    Usually news reports on such violent crime is focused more so on the perpetrator, than the victim. But hey, okay.

    But that link looks like something to look into. Unfortunately, your results are completely different to my results; please use a link to a static search engine like duckduckgo that shows the same results to everyone.

[–]SundogsPlace[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

To #1. you're entirely arguing semantics, why?

To #2. You're unfamiliar with patterning in the sense I posed it? How strange, I read a lot of people discussing similar, but you've got no clue. As far as rapes going unreported, you mean like the feminazi's are doing by silencing women, and children raped by rapefugees?

To#3 I do use duckduckgo, I also use bing, and google to compare search results. Often times, when talking with SJW's, I simply refer to Google, as it's more along that 'non polar opinion' right? Only in the google hemisphere, but they're impartial, right?! LOL

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

  1. Because semantics can be misleading. The title says that migrants were banned, when in fact they were merely uninvited. They can get into schools just as easily as anyone else now; through the proper procedures.
  2. Unless your patterns are from going 'round asking people if they've been raped (which probably wouldn't give you good stats anyway) then your pattern is from the pattern in reporting. You should know that that's often completely unrelated to the pattern in the real world.