you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SundogsPlace[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

To #1. you're entirely arguing semantics, why?

To #2. You're unfamiliar with patterning in the sense I posed it? How strange, I read a lot of people discussing similar, but you've got no clue. As far as rapes going unreported, you mean like the feminazi's are doing by silencing women, and children raped by rapefugees?

To#3 I do use duckduckgo, I also use bing, and google to compare search results. Often times, when talking with SJW's, I simply refer to Google, as it's more along that 'non polar opinion' right? Only in the google hemisphere, but they're impartial, right?! LOL

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

  1. Because semantics can be misleading. The title says that migrants were banned, when in fact they were merely uninvited. They can get into schools just as easily as anyone else now; through the proper procedures.
  2. Unless your patterns are from going 'round asking people if they've been raped (which probably wouldn't give you good stats anyway) then your pattern is from the pattern in reporting. You should know that that's often completely unrelated to the pattern in the real world.