Astronomers Accidentally Find A Galaxy That Hasn’t Birthed Any Stars

submitted by ZephirAWT from discovermagazine.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

With plasma cosmology theories /s/Plasmacosmology , there is no big bang and no inflation.
And that removes the need for dark matter, dark energy or other dark magic to create complex galaxies in a very short timeline.
This also explains why the furthest galaxies are very similar to nearby galaxies.

Instead we have influence from electromagnetism on plasma.
Which creates lines of structures and other connections between cosmic bodies.
We can see evidence of this in the strong magnetism in galaxies and these line-structures.
And from basic physics we know that only electricity produces magnetism in non-solids.

Plasma can also form structures in microgravity, but few people know it.
See video
It seems that some kind of van-der-waals forces become active.

Plasma on the sun also shows a lot of chemical reactions.
These are visible in the solar spectrum. see video

[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Yes, /s/Plasmacosmology has many correct insights - nevertheless there are dark matter effects which can not be explained with it (like the Allais effect).

I'd call it high energy end of dark matter physics (hot dark matter theory).

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Never seen that Allais effect before. Probably because not many theories support it, and thus do not want to mention it.

It seems to depend on the region, so it could even be a seismic effect.

[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Never seen that Allais effect before. Probably because not many theories support it, and thus do not want to mention it. It seems to depend on the region, so it could even be a seismic effect.

Yea, exactly. Currently there is a fight between proponents of hot dark matter composed of particles (WIMPs, plasma particles) and warm dark matter which handles dark matter as an spherically symmetric extension of relativistic field (TeVeS/STVG, MOND/MOD, MiHSc/QI theories). Nevertheless there are directional phenomena (dark matter filaments, Allais effects) which point to LeSage shielding model of gravity (i.e. cold dark matter) and which no one of the above camps really likes. Actually dark matter can be a mixture of all cold, warm and hot dark matter effects together.

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I am from the camp: no dark matter.
And there is a lot of evidence for that.
So here is a long story:

Dark matter filaments are either electrical currents or plasma currents.
We see gigantic plasma currents shoot out from centers of galaxies.
Both have strong magnetic fields which we can measure with the zeeman effect.
So this evidence is already visible.

The initial idea of dark matter is only about the speeds of stars in a galaxy.
Note: It is not missing matter, but missing forces to begin with.
But if we just focus on the rotation-speed of the galaxy, there may be no missing any forces.
The speed of stars moving around in the galaxy approaches a constant speed closer to the outside edge of the galaxy.
Instead of slowing down, what would be expected if each star has an orbit around the center.

But that idea is basically false. Stars do not orbit around the center, but around each other.
The sun orbits another star. That star orbits another one. And in the end they all go around the center.
So as long the chain of orbits is in a similar direction, the rotation-speed would not slow down.
And from mathematics we know that a combination of many orbits can flatten out.
Because that is how one draws a Hilbert-curve
One can get all kinds of Fourier figures,
depending on the period and radius of each cycle.

Additional forces can come from dust, gasses and plasma which are invisible.

There is can also be the side-effect of special relativity.
It has been used to explain magnetic forces from the electric field and speed.
In the same way one can get rotational forces from gravity and speed.

Then there is even electrical charged plasma in space.
Mainstream astronomy pretends plasma in space has magical magnetic properties,
and has no influence at the same time.
But in real-world experiments we see that plasma in space can be isolating, or conduction, depending on many factors.
It also seems much denser than many astronomers think.
A continuous flow of charged particles, like the solar wind or galaxy wind, can charge certain bodies,
creating additional electric or magnetic forces.

All these complex factors together give astronomers the illusion of missing forces.
Which creates a research bias that promotes "dark matter".

[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Dark matter filaments are either electrical currents or plasma currents.

Dark matter is hyperdimensional gravitoelectromagnetic phenomena, which shares many aspects common with both electromagnetic field and fluids at the same moment - hence the plasma analogies. But the scale usually doesn't fit.

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It is funny how the wikipedia page of "gravitoelectromagnetic phenomena" points to Gravity probe-B.
Which gave a zero result for general relativity.
Then they worked towards the expected result, by imaging a force that exactly did the opposite.

Gravity-"magnetism" is one of the many points in my list.
It is just a side-effect of special relativity on gravity.
It is not hyperdimensional. Nor "matter".
And indeed it could add to extra attraction when masses rotate around each other.

[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It is funny how the wikipedia page of "gravitoelectromagnetic phenomena" points to Gravity probe-B. Which gave a zero result for general relativity.

The anomalies of Gravity probe-B may result just from dark matter magnetic turbulences. According to many theories the dark matter should interact strongly just with superconductors. In this sense Gravity probe/B detected what it was supposed to do.. ;-)

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That is just layer of unfounded hypotheses on top of each other.
We could just say that god created everything in mysterious ways.
And it would be just as scientific.

And I studied superconductors very well. No dark matter there.

What I did discover is that mainstream astronomy does not understand basic electromagnetism at all.
And so they invent weird things to compensate for their lack of understanding.
Like this superconductivity.

As an example: The magnetic reconnection is pure nonsense from a physics point of view.
It breaks with every basic law.
Frozen magnetic fields are also nonsense, but in a different way. Magnetism can only stay static in solid ferro-magnetic material, but not in dust.
As dust clumps together. And additionally liquid, gas and plasma are above the curie temperature.

[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I studied superconductors very well. No dark matter there

I do consider it very relevant for explanation of Podkletnov/Poher effects, both mechanism of superconductivity.

The magnetic reconnection is pure nonsense from a physics point of view

This concept was developed and pushed just by author of Plasma cosmology.