You may see more examples on /s/CorruptScience

How many of those were "retracted" because they revealed the problems of Big Pharma?

Most science publications have published commercials or propaganda instead of science.
And peer reviewing becomes censorship when money, reputation or politics is involved.
I also see a lot of circular reasoning, preventing new insights.

Because most scientists are stuck into a paradigm, they can only add a minimal share to this paradigm.
And to stick out they have to exaggerate or even fraud their results.
And many will be tempted to make up a whole paper with copying something or generating something via AI.