all 2 comments

[–]StrategicTactic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I will assume your question is in good faith. There is a difference between twitter and the government, which is not recognized in your question. The government would be one who deems someone "too dangerous", but I am not aware of that being a crime itself. Twitter deemed Trump to have violated their terms of service, which is apparently open to interpretation as many otherwise overt calls to violence have not been censored.

I can only assume that Twitter thinks some people should be treated differently than others, based upon an arbitrary metric which looks to be political in nature. I came to that conclusion long before the 2016 election.

[–]Tegra[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Read the group description ffs