you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I can see it, but I do not agree with your take on talking about "ouragenda" when MY agenda is the waking up of human consciousness, which is the only possible exit from the current paradigm. To do this, people must be aware of their agenda and of a great many other things.

I report to nobody. While I appove of your efforts because they are in the correct spirit, I know for a fact that they are doomed to fail, due to their collective nature. YOU are much more shackled than you could believe. You will come to see this, EVENTUALLY.

[–]EddieC 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Pray tell - what is missing from here.
 
IMO we will have a better chance of "waking up human consciousness" when people can see by comparing Direct Systems vs Indirect Systems that

1) Under the current paradigm of Indirect Systems, people are at risk of being scammed and are being rapaciously scammed
2) the less risky, hence better alternative – Direct Systems – is doable / within reach
 
Hence, IF people want no/less risk of usurpation: Direct X > Indirect X
The question naturally then turns to:
Why are we/people still talking about Indirect X,
when we/people should be discussing AND doing Direct X?

 
 

Some people seem to be triggered by the word "Collective"
- how about "Aggregative"?
Isn't 'human consciousness' aggregative in nature?
If not, what word would you use to describe it?
 

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

To explain what is missing, it would take me at least a few hundred pages of text.

I told you what's wrong with it, and that's as much as I will do.

[–]EddieC 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

MY agenda is the waking up of human consciousness, which is the only possible exit from the current paradigm. To do this, people must be aware of their agenda and of a great many other things.

 
Do you have a plan, or thoughts, on how to go about achieving this?
 

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, but it requires a complete re-engineering of all the systems in the human mind. Only a very determined individual can accomplish this. What passes for "mind" in the world's populations is nothing but garbage with a bit of logic and intuition dabbed on top. Nothing truly useful can come of it. Example: "science" and technology: every time the "human mind" solves a problem, it creates a few new ones. There is no end to this, because of the fractal mind-relation to reality that stems from the extreme pollution of the psyche.