The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women

submitted by jet199 from (spiked-online.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

https://archive.ph/mP8ff

Look if you can read the first few paragraphs and conclude that he only raped one person, then perhaps you should sit down with a wife, sister, mother or trusted female, if you have any, and ask them whether they agree.

I think forcing your dick into someone's mouth such that they have to get violent in order to get you off them - to me, that's a rape. Also anything he did with a 16 year old is rape where I live, fortunately for brand apparently not where he lives.

I don't really care that you dont believe he's a multiple rapist. It's a nuance and I really don't want to hear you argue it. Find a trusted woman and ask her whether or not that counts as rape, I really do not want to hear your thoughts on it

[–]Hematomato 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I think forcing your dick into someone's mouth such that they have to get violent in order to get you off them - to me, that's a rape. Also anything he did with a 16 year old is rape where I live, fortunately for brand apparently not where he lives.

And I think that if someone tries to give their girlfriend a rough blowjob, thinking she'll be into it, and she's not feeling it so she smacks him on the stomach and he stops, that's, well, not something I need the government to get involved in.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Who told you the government were involved

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

We'll see if criminal charges follow. Even now, the British government has apparently sent out letters to media companies asking them to deplatform him.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Oh so why did you say it then

Were you just talking out your ass

apparently sent out letters

Any evidence ? Besides the contents of your rectum?

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Any evidence ? Besides the contents of your rectum?

Sure, here you go.

You probably should have done a quick Google search before all the "rectum" stuff. Now you just look like a dipshit.

https://twitter.com/rumblevideo/status/1704584927834960196

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Why would I do searches to validate the things you suggest? If you suggest there's a spaghetti monster in orbit of mars am I supposed to go out and try to prove or disprove it?

Anyway, because you linked to social media instead of a proper source, I did go ahead and do that googling, and I found this too

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/378/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/197530/culture-media-and-sport-committee-chair-writes-to-broadcasters-and-tiktok-over-russell-brand-allegations-and-investigations/

I totally agree with you, assuming that is a true copy of the letter to rumble which you linked to.

The UK government would be totally overstepping their bounds, by sending this - honestly creepy and horrible - letter to rumble.

In this case, it's a committee of MPs, so not the actual government, but a group of representatives who meet to consider advice to the government about culture media and sports

You can see more about them here

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/378/culture-media-and-sport-committee/

It's not the government but a group of reps who meet and put together advice. So, sure, close enough.

It's a horrible letter and a fantastic response from rumble for their PR.

[–]jet199[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There is no way a parliamentary committee made up of elected MPs is not the government.

The knots you have to tie yourself in to make this OK should tell you something.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey sorry in the UK "the government" or HMG refers to the PM and the cabinet. Some random MP wouldn't be referred to as "the government". So I am not tied in knots, thanks for your concern, there's absolutely no sense in which some random MP out of 600 would be referred to as "the government"

[–]jet199[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They did

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/378/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/197530/culture-media-and-sport-committee-chair-writes-to-broadcasters-and-tiktok-over-russell-brand-allegations-and-investigations/

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

/u/Site_rly_sux will believe every woman, except for the women who expose the vaccine crimes, etc.

/u/Site_rly_sux is a pharma shill, and Brand is attacking the pharma global coup.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Dude I don't think, anyone at saidit who has read my posts before, is thinking "wow this guy just believes things without good evidence"

Feel free to point to something I believed without good evidence. I would welcome you to do that. I have pretty good evidence that Brand is a rapey sex creep.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'm close to certain that you're another socks' puppet.

Probably a pharma bot.

/u/Bot_rly_sux

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

imbecile

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/u/cunninglingus says

imbecile

The personal attack is unimpressive. Why are you defending a pharma shill?

I wouldn't be surprised if you are another sock puppet shill for /u/Bot_rly_sux

[–]jet199[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Please engage your brain.

It's simply not possible to force your dick into someone's mouth. Your cock isn't rock hard no matter what your egirl tells you. There's simply no way the 2 of them got into that position without her allowing it.

Then after they got into that position she realised it wasn't great for her, she couldn't breath and likely panicked but she couldn't tell him either so she had to beat him off.

If you ask a women who has had sex she will likely tell you she has actually had that happen to her at some point while giving a BJ and didn't consider it rape.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your thoughts on this are also some that I didn't want to hear. Go and have this debate with a woman you trust IRL and ask her