you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]stickdog 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You seem to have a lot of problems here and zero of them are related to the fact that you have tried and convicted an individual based solely on a corporate media hit job.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Solely on the facts that his rape victims said he raped them, plus his long history of shitty, addict and creep behavior

[–]jet199[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you are proving the article right.

You are like those women phoning the investigation team to complain Brand didn't call them after they had sex as though that is evidence of a crime.