"Seduced"

submitted by bucetao6969 from (old.reddit.com)

all 16 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Only 2 years in jail for drugging and raping a minor. WTF.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's a woman. Woman can do no wrong.

[–]hfxB0oyA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Was it an actual woman?

[–]bucetao6969[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes a post-walled frankenstein

[–]weavilsatemyface 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And 2 billion men around the world instantly think "Some guys have all the luck!"

We've really become a society of cucks. Forty years ago 14 year old teens used to dream about meeting some 22 y.o. who would give them dope and booze and then fuck them silly. Now 28 year old man-children are fantasising about My Little Pony and talking about raising the age of consent to 25.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

reminds me of the infamous "underaged 21 year old"

I do support raising the age of consent when it comes to marriage.

14 years olds still dream of having sex with adult woman it's normal due to puberty. Age of consent is 15/16 you just wait 1/2 years you fuck it's a teen.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Newspaper says woman used drug to "seduce" him. The website changes those words to rape. Depending on the region a wording on a news article could risk a defamation case against it but the general soft wording of the article makes me think this wasn't it so it's still fucked up. (A)

[–]weavilsatemyface 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Whether you agree with them or not, under UK law this was not rape as rape is legally defined in the UK as strictly involving insertion of a penis.

Whatever the woman did to this teenager, whether you think it was good or bad or indifferent, under British law it wasn't murder, or burglary, or arson, and it wasn't rape either.

CC u/William_World

[–]William_World 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

yeah most agree the boy was lucky but we like to point out the hypicrisy because so many wrongly say women have it hard in society

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

so many wrongly say women have it hard in society

Women do have it hard in society. Some women, some times.

And so do men. Some men, some times.

And some people, both men and women, have it easy. They're either incredibly lucky or members of the elite class.

If I were to balance it, I would say that in general men are given certain privileges over women in return for being expected to give their live or health in dangerous situations, while women are given different and usually lesser privileges over men in return for being forced into a subservient position.

It varies from time to time and culture to culture. But there is no time or place where either men or women have 100% of the power and privilege over the other.

[–]William_World 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

nah, life on easy mode

[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

post a synopsis

[–]TaseAFeminist4Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Neckbeardy

[–]hfxB0oyA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

One of the comments in the thread:

Rape = penis inserted without consent. Anything else is not rape. In some countries, a woman can put her biggest sextoy in a boy's ass, still not rape.

Reddit filth doing what Reddit filth does.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

False. They are stating what the laws describes as rape. They're correct.

It's not just about woman on men. Remember this was a big contention point on People v Turner, a man on a woman.

[–]hfxB0oyA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting, I didn't know that. Canadian sexual assault law describes it more broadly.