you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]spezz 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

we've got a modern and evolved form of tribalism it's called fascism

edit: and if you want to add some Christianity into the mix, you'll have Clerical Fascism

[–]Leo_Littlebook 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

ethno-nationalism is not tribalism.

Tribalism is when tribes are actual intact entities in control of their own territory and bloodlines. As in Biblical Law.

Scale dehumanizes.

[–]spezz 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

fuck that semitic shit, that may work well and good for nigs and kikes, but whites can function in larger societies, of course it's good to have community and localism, but basic tribalism is fucking dumb because we've expanded upon and adapted for our current era where have more people

[–]Leo_Littlebook 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Facepalm.

As I just said, ethno-nationalism and tribalism are compatible, just as federalism and a republic are compatible.

And no, Aryans have not evolutionarily adapted to civilizational scale. As the rapid collapse of the USA demonstrates.

[–]spezz 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The reason the US is collapsing is because it isn't white and homogeneous. Negros and spics are off committing crimes and miscegenation is at an all time high. Tribalism is a part of ethnonationalism and within our ethnonationalist nation we have localism where are close to and have an attachment to their communities

[–]Leo_Littlebook 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You're mistaking the opportunistic infections for the original disease.

Localism done right is not just subsidiarity. The Bible binds the patrilineages to the land. If you have unlimited capitalism in land and unlimited internal migration, then you get an atomized exploited evil mess, like the USA is now. Tribalism is about genes, not just scale. It requires semi-porous genetic "villages", not just administrative/legal villages.

How can altruism evolve at atomized scale? It can't. You get political sociopaths. Only group selection creates altruism. The smaller the groups, the more altruism.

[–]spezz 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Tribalism alone at this stage is fucking stupid, I don't a fuck what the semites in the Old Testament we are white not a bunch of kikes. As for political sociopaths, yes I do agree that is an issue and we need altruism, but whites are already the most pathologically altruistic race on earth, the issue is usury and greed, if banned usury and banned lobbying and limited the amount that can be given to politicians these issues wouldn't exist, not to mention expelling the jew from the US

[–]Leo_Littlebook 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You forget that Aryan Europe is composed of several major migrations, one from the Near East. The fact that Aryans have lost the Near East today does not mean they had when the Biblical Law was given. You should not forget that the achievements of the Near East in antiquity belong to Aryas, just as the Greeks were once fair Aryans.

I didn't ever advocate tribalism alone. Obviously that strategy died with the Native Americans. Afghanistan shows it can work OK with a strong religion, which may become relevant if the USA dissolves into chaos. But it's far from optimal.

Obviously Biblical Law banned usury, that's part of what I'm talking about when I say capitalism needs to be balanced by tribalism. Usury laws basically say that people are part of tribes which have their own evolutionary "market" of blood and soil, and therefore mere money isn't allowed to overrule the more ancient and more important "market".

As for some kind of republican government in which lobbying might exist, it's a bad idea. The tribes should be militarily sovereign, and cooperate through diplomacy. That's the patriarchal way. This is possible with a unifying religion, genetic kinship and shared borders.

Failing that, some weak federation such as the Swiss cantons is a proven model. The US model obviously failed. Imperial models are terrible for the host's genetic interest because they inevitably cause massive miscegenation on host territory.