You forget that Aryan Europe is composed of several major migrations, one from the Near East. The fact that Aryans have lost the Near East today does not mean they had when the Biblical Law was given. You should not forget that the achievements of the Near East in antiquity belong to Aryas, just as the Greeks were once fair Aryans.

I didn't ever advocate tribalism alone. Obviously that strategy died with the Native Americans. Afghanistan shows it can work OK with a strong religion, which may become relevant if the USA dissolves into chaos. But it's far from optimal.

Obviously Biblical Law banned usury, that's part of what I'm talking about when I say capitalism needs to be balanced by tribalism. Usury laws basically say that people are part of tribes which have their own evolutionary "market" of blood and soil, and therefore mere money isn't allowed to overrule the more ancient and more important "market".

As for some kind of republican government in which lobbying might exist, it's a bad idea. The tribes should be militarily sovereign, and cooperate through diplomacy. That's the patriarchal way. This is possible with a unifying religion, genetic kinship and shared borders.

Failing that, some weak federation such as the Swiss cantons is a proven model. The US model obviously failed. Imperial models are terrible for the host's genetic interest because they inevitably cause massive miscegenation on host territory.