The Evils of Socialism

submitted by EndlessSunflowers from (i.imgur.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

I am very correct on more matters than even you can recognize. But since nobody wants to hear about it, I STFU.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

You need to find humility as well as learn about science, not spelled with a p.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I have more of both than you can even imagine. But whatever dude. You think the process of doing science means the same thing as the nature of science, which makes it impossible to have any conversation with you on the topic.

I told you, one cannot discuss how the scientific process applies within a particular discipline with a lay person who does not understand the basic principles of said discipline. However, one can discuss the NATURE of a discipline as science. I have been ready and willing to do the second, until you conflated with the first and made a big whole lot of diarrhea of the whole conversation. THAT is how things don't move forward. In that regard, you get an A.

But I get it you have the imaginary status of your position to "defend" and as such, sacrificing a discussion here and there to the hubris of your imaginary superiority is worth it. I understand perfectly well, most people operate on such a basis.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Sheer fucking hubris.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I have an idea: If every definition you are arguing here about is so biased and misused, why don't we just find a new one ?

Mathematicians do this magic trick since the word mathematician exists, i believe.

They do it so long until they finally can derive something useful from this definition that fits also in the rest of their system. Sometimes they get even something actually apply-able out of this. :-)

Proving things is actually very easy once somebody found the right (i'd rather call creative enough OR abstract enough) definition.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Go for it.

I respect math but can't tame her.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's definitely a her. I'm quite sure of that bc. she is so beautiful and such a fkn bitch at the same time.

Even after years of a serious relationship with her (almost a marriage) i still most times can't get what actually is in her head.