Virtue SignalingSouth Carolina Trans Teen Killed; Man He (no, SHE) Met for Date Charged With Murder

submitted by ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah from (advocate.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JulienMayfair 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I'm not really sure why this article is posted here. A trans man met a man online, and he turned out to be a murderer. Who knows? Maybe it wasn't his first murder. It could happen to anyone getting into a car with someone they don't really know.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think it's because girls and women often (perhaps even usually) go the trans route in an attempt to escape misogyny: they think that not "identifying" as female means that they won't be treated-- and, especially, mistreated-- as female. So they're less likely to exercise the sort of caution that women normally do where male strangers are concerned. Sure, a man could have suffered the same fate in this situation... but for a woman? The risk is much greater. Yet transgenderism assures them otherwise. Because they're MEN now! That's exactly the kind of pernicious lie that gender-woo specializes in. And ruins lives with. Whether by destroying people's hard-won rights, their bodies, their sexuality, their connection to who they really are... or even getting them killed. It's just a variation on an all-too-familiar theme. That this denial of reality comes at a high price.

[–]JulienMayfair 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

All your points are valid in the abstract, but we really don't know for sure that that's what happened here. We have no idea what transpired between the victim and the killer. We don't know their specific motivations. I just don't like the idea of jumping to conclusions without knowing for sure or of co-opting someone's murder to make a point.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Fair enough. And I don't suppose we ever necessarily will know, at least if we have to depend on the likes of The Advocate (still can't believe that this is the world we're living in, where I'd ever be typing those words...), should the facts that eventually emerge be deemed to make trans look bad.

Julien, do sometimes find yourself feeling as though you're living in some dystopian novel, too? :(

[–]JulienMayfair 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Journalism is not in a good place these days, to put it mildly, so you're going to get a lot of low-effort reporting and clickbait. Some facts might emerge in the trial of the killer, especially if his girlfriend agrees to testify against him in exchange for leniency. Also, any digital communication between the killer and the victim might come to light in court. You just have to wait.

My classic example of this is the Duke Lacrosse case back in 2006. A black woman accused white athletes of sexual assault, and everyone piled on with the perceived underdog against the privileged athletes. But then, as the case progressed, it all fell apart. It turned out the accuser had lied, and, even more, the district attorney prosecuting the case was eventually himself charged with criminal misconduct for attempting to suppress evidence and disbarred. The accuser later went on to kill her boyfriend.

Whenever I feel like jumping to a conclusion on minimal evidence because it fits some narrative, I take a step back and remind myself not to get ahead of the facts.