Beyond that the NEW YORK TIMES accepts without question that transgender activists had the "right" to Trojan Horse the gay rights movement, it's really offensive that the Woker-Than-Thou NEW YORK TIMES will celebrate the "journey" and use female pronouns for this man and act as if he's some kind of civil rights hero when trans-identified males like him are APPROPRIATING women's biology and OPPRESSION and COLONIZING & OCCUPYING women's SAFE SPACES.

Again I ask the question to the NEW YORK TIMES and all these fucking bozos spewing the Stunning & Brave gender narrative: "What if Phyllis Frye or Bruce Jenner had "come out" as a minority man?"

I am mixed-race; I am living proof that it is possible to be two races. It is impossible to be two sexes, yet the appropriation of sex is celebrated by the NYT/"Paper of Record" while the appropriation of race gets one shamed, threatened and canceled.

I think we need to call out the transracial versus transgender hypocrisy to all and sundry every time we encounter it - I want the NYT to explain why it's not OK to appropriate race, prejudice against which is based on one's subjective perception of phenotype, but OK to appropriate biological sex, which is determined at conception and is not based on perception?