Why in the fuck isn't the FBI/police involved with AgainstHatesubreddits!?

submitted by [deleted] from self.LGBDropTheT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SailorMoon2020 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Y'all keep saying this but no one has yet to provide proof. If it is true these users post cp, then why haven't y'all taken screenshots or screen recordings, and submitted them to the FBI, or better yet, the media.

Y'all said this about the Super Straight sub and I was on that sub even as it went banned. I was browsing new post and then when I refreshed, the sub was banned. Never saw any CP or porn in general on the sub.

The FBI isn't going investigate heresy. Rape and child molestation are serious accusations. So unless someone is able to provide a zip folder of undisputed evidence then I suggest dropping it.

[–]insta 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Y'all keep saying this but no one has yet to provide proof.

I don't disagree overall, however to counter someone's argument that X should be investigated with "There is no evidence" is kinda a circular argument. Obviously we can't go investigating everyone and their grandma for CP but the just saying "Why isn't there some news article about this thing you want investigated?" is not reason to not investigate something.

[–]SailorMoon2020 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Who said anything about a news article?

I said, "submit the evidence to the FBI or even better yet, the media". This is another way of saying, 'the public out cries increase when more media attention is brought to a situation'.

Again, the FBI does not go off of heresy. And with America's sexist past: the Salem Witch Trials, America's racist past: lynching based off of false rape accusations, America's homophobic past: the San Antonio 5, this is a good thing.

If what y'all say is true about this cp then obtaining evidence should be a walk in the park.

[–]insta 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Who said anything about a news article? ....

I said, "submit the evidence to .... the media".

It is really annoying when people say "When did I say that?" when I'm simply taking your own logic to it's reasonable conclusion. The next sentence you wrote down pretty much makes your first part moot.

the Salem Witch Trials,

I am so tired of people always desperate to bring up black & white photos (in this case drawings) to prove a point. Can we please try to limit our examples to the previous 2 maybe 3 generations please? Why are you even discussing something that happened in the 17th century?

If what y'all say is true about this cp then obtaining evidence should be a walk in the park.

Again, I don't really believe in the CP stuff either. I just hated your logic of "the lack of evidence (because lack of investigation) means there shouldn't be investigations (because lack of evidence)". It's just a very dismissive handwave of a problem.

[–]SailorMoon2020 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Again, in America there needs to be evidence for an investigation. Heresy is not case worthy in the American juridical system.

I also didn't say "lack of evidence", I said "evidence". Lack of evidence is enough cause to warrant an investigation which does mean they'll be just cause to issue a warrant for arrest.