you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]OPPRESSED_REPTILIANIntersex male | GNC | Don't call me "a gay", "twink" or "queen" 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Gonna go out on a limb and guess it was the radfem/"gender critical" stuff that got you banned, not criticizing the T.

[–]Applecat[S] 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I assumed the opposite. Most likely no one would have reported a shelf for "lesbian separatism" but they sure would have for "transing children."

[–]OPPRESSED_REPTILIANIntersex male | GNC | Don't call me "a gay", "twink" or "queen" 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Nah. Radical Feminists tend to be abrasive in ways beyond just "transphobia," and few people tolerate them. I could be wrong, but I mean... I'm always skeptical when a radfem comes crying like "THEY BANNED ME FOR SPEAKING THE TRUTH ABOUT HRT!1" then you read into their post history and it's full of hateful garbage directed at many groups, not even just transgender stuff.

[–]Applecat[S] 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I had never posted anything on Goodreads beyond criticism of transgender ideology.

[–]Archie 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

No worries that guy is a regular troll

[–]Applecat[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, thank you, I wasn't sure.

I can assure everyone I never interacted with people on Goodreads. I never commented on people's reviews or in groups. I set my privacy settings so that no one could message me or leave comments on my reviews because I didn't want to be subject to abuse or drawn into fruitless debates.