use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~1 user here now
Introduce yourself to the SaidIt community
I like to engage with people of differing opinions! Why don't others elsewhere?
submitted 3 years ago by SpeakPeasy from self.Introductions
view the rest of the comments →
[–]SonterLord 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (3 children)
I'm being sincere when I say: why don't you create a board here explicitly encouraging (good faith) debate? Or convince like minded others to do so.
This is gunna sound shitty of me but I hate arguing with people because I suck at articulating my convictions.
[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
(good faith) debate
That just leads to biased bannings of anyone arguing in "bad faith", defined strictly as anyone the mods don't like.
[–]SonterLord 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
I do agree that the meaning of 'good faith' is too ambiguous to maintain in any official capacity. r/AskTheDonald used to be OKAY but I'm not so sure anymore.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
It was used on the ukpolitics subreddit for a while. What it lead to was that when a user made a perfectly valid statement that they wholly believed, but one which happened to be unpopular, the mob would cry 'bad faith' because they just couldn't accept anyone could make such a comment in earnest, and they were so offended by it they thought they were being trolled. Because the mob were the majority they just report bombed anyone with a minority view for bad faith posting, and the mods wanting a quiet life just banned the single poster to placate them. It killed the debate. They rolled back on the rule eventually.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]SonterLord 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]SonterLord 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)