There is nothing morally wrong with the statement, "We must secure the existence of our people, and a future for white children." - unless you think the extinction of White people is a moral imperative.

I was just going to lurk in this conversation, but this looks like a good hook to ask a question (or a suite of questions, actually) that I don't usually have a context for.

Why does any particular skin pigmentation have a moral value? Why are the only two options "white good" and "white bad"? Why can we not simply secure a future for children?

I don't really care that I'm white, and I think that is the morally proper position. I get pissed off when people want to mistreat me for it, but that doesn't affect my ideas on ethics.