you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Femaleisnthateful 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What is it with 'social justice' movements propping up the worst men?

You'd think transactivists would be busily disavowing people like Chris Chan. I guess they can't do that, because that would mean having a conversation about who is and isn't 'trans' and what to do about predators and people with mental illnesses (which aren't gender dysphoria) co-opting trans identities.

[–]soundsituation 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What is it with 'social justice' movements propping up the worst men?

They're propping up the worst men and women. I think it's because "social justice" is an attack on language and meaning. If words mean whatever you say they mean, or in the case of queer theory/"tucute" ideology, mean nothing at all, narcissists and psychopaths are going to take advantage of that because it's an opportunity to grab power and attention.

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're propping up the worst men and women.

Even worse, when the pendulum inevitably swings back, these are the cowardly assholes who will somehow walk out of the shitstorm unscathed, smelling like roses.