all 9 comments

[–]neomarxist_bullshitCzech[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Cringe

[–]fschmidt 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Putin is right. Freedom of speech doesn't protect defamation of any kind including defamation of religion.

[–]CottageSamuelSlovak 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Freedom of speech doesn't protect

It does. Otherwise it's not freedom of speech but list of the things you are allowed to speak of.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Insult isn't defamation.

[–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I am not sure exactly where the line is. I am not a lawyer. I would assume that publicly implying that someone is a pedophile or something like that would be defamation.

[–]CottageSamuelSlovak 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When it comes to defamation, it's important for claim to be untrue or at least unproven. And while we can excuse it with foreign morality and people not fully understanding certain things ages ago, fact as it's recorded remains that he married child which was around 6 years old. And three years later he laid on bed with her.

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is actually untrue. It is true that today's Muslims are morons who believe this kind of nonsense, but that doesn't excuse defaming Muhammad.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

soy

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Religions culture during the baby booming generation helped make the US great.