I no longer watch tennis since it decided to stop being mildly erotic.

submitted by JerkChicken from (self.Entertainment)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (30 children)

Sly yet dumb woman who figured out she gets paid to show her butt, not play sports.

This kind of bullshit is why female sports are a joke. Nobody cares about female sports unless it's transwomen who wants easy wins, or creeps who wants to ogle the athletes.

This kind of bullshit is why being a woman sucks.

[–]JerkChicken[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (29 children)

Women have never objectified men, no? Let's not fall victim to ignorance.

I find women's sports more enjoyable than men's sports, why must it be islamified by covering people up and censoring the natural form? The feminist would rather all athletes to be fat or ugly to remove all doubt that people watch just to see how many points are scored.

My post was in jest following recent news that tennis players will be wearing black shorts to enforce modesty, it's more virtue signalling than anything else.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

I find women's sports more enjoyable than men's sports, why must it be islamified by covering people up and censoring the natural form?

If your enjoyment of women's sports is somehow diminished by the fact they wear shorts instead of skirts..... then I don't think you enjoy women sports at all, you just enjoy looking at tits and ass. So, I approve of this change. Let people watch sport because it's sport.

Women usually don't objectify men as much, no. I've never heard a woman talk in a crass way of a man like it was some kind of object to use, never in the creepy, demeaning way some men do with women. Keep in mind that being sexually attracted to someone, and objectifying someone (keyword: OBJECT) are not the same thing. You can find a woman hot without considering her a piece of meat. Try it.

[–]JerkChicken[S] 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (27 children)

We get it, your fat.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

Ah, here's another! You guys are like a hivemind! The cats, buddy, you forgot mentioning I have cats. No, I'm not fat and I actually hate cats, but wow. I should make a study on this because you all speak like reading from a script.

[–]Node 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

you forgot mentioning I have cats.

You have cats?

[–]JerkChicken[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Cat ownership compensates for the lack of penis in their lives.

[–]Node 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I dunno, a cat is small compensation for the inability to write cursive in the snow.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Reading comprehension. You didn't learn it in school eh?

[–]Node 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

You got me. I learned it at home around 2nd or 3rd grade. Articles in the newspaper revealed that humans are mostly retarded. Later I learned about the bell curve, and what average IQ being 100 really means.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I learned it at home around 2nd or 3rd grade.

And it shows.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Are you btw u/nonpenishaver? Nice to see you here after long time

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're funny. Good luck with losing weight, or whatever your problem is.

what average IQ being 100 really means.

Thanks for demonstrating.

[–]JerkChicken[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

Some people see a joke and brush it off as a joke, and then there's you. I bet your a fun person.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Mmh. I think it stopped being a joke the 12th time someone made it here. It then became a case study. You also never learnt spelling in class, by the way, eh? There's me speaking a foreign language to communicate with an idiot, and then there's an idiot who can't spell "you're" in his mother tongue.

[–]JerkChicken[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Ooo grammatical burn, ouch, I'm so injured by your burn, ermagerd, staaaap.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

That wasn't a "burn". Just a statement of fact. Are you quite done? Because I think I am. Keep yapping.

[–]JerkChicken[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

I fail to see what the issue is with people enjoying the aesthetic pleasures of modern traditional sporting dress in women's sports without the requirement of political gesturing, and why you feel the need to attack men for responding quite naturally to those athletes form, which they have clearly worked very hard to achieve. Seriously, it sounds more like jealousy, bitterness and resentment on your part. Frankly, if you are unable to see the lighthearted sentiment of the original post, you need to get out more.