Johnny Depp WINS Defamation Lawsuit Against Amber Heard, Jury Finds Aquaman Actress Acted “With Actual Malice”

submitted by carn0ld03 from boundingintocomics.com

all 3 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]raven9 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I dont think that jury was worth a shit. The jury paper had the supposedly defamatory statement on it by Amber heard. - "I spoke up against sexual violence - and faced our culture's wrath. That has to change".

Then there are 6 questions about that statement the answers to them must all be yes for it to be defamation. The jury answered yes to them all.

The third question asks, - The statement is false?

So how can, "I spoke up against sexual violence - and faced our culture's wrath. That has to change", be a false statement?

It seems to me the jury can not have properly examined those questions or if they did, they did not understand the significance of them. I think what they did was they had already decided they wanted to find JD innocent of defamation and the smartest one of the bunch said ok so we just put yes to all the questions and we're done.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Was it really a trial so much as a publicity stunt? I mean, who is paying for all this and where is the money from the judgement coming from because my understanding is that they're both broke now.

Johnny Depp makes a big comeback to the silver screen where he finds redemption after getting sober.

Amber Heard is just gonna Rose McGowan Away, paid off to leave the public eye and shut up.

[–]JoeyJoeJoe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The grammar in much of the official proceedings is ambiguous and clunky. Pretty embarrassing really.