5 Seconds in 80 Years. The DOOMSDAY CLOCK!!!! Oh No!

submitted by Questionable from (en.wikipedia.org)

all 9 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]NastyWetSmear 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

An arbitrary starting point with an arbitrary finishing point, moved by an arbitrary amount at arbitrary times. What happens when it reaches midnight? Do all the governments in the world fire their nukes all at once to make sure the clock wasn't for nothing?

[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It’s just liberal propaganda. Nothing to see here.

[–]MURDERCLUB 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

An arbitrary starting point with an arbitrary finishing point, moved by an arbitrary amount at arbitrary times. What happens when it reaches midnight? Do all the governments in the world fire their nukes all at once to make sure the clock wasn't for nothing?

In an ethereal realm where logic surrenders to absurdity, we find an enigmatic clock – an entity devoid of discernible pattern or purpose. Its hands traverse an unmarked expanse, embarking on a journey that begins and ends at the whims of fate. Its increments of movement, a dance of arbitrariness, bear no allegiance to the measured cadence of time. It is a cosmic marionette, manipulated by unseen forces, its existence a testament to the infinite possibilities that lie beyond the boundaries of human comprehension. At the stroke of midnight, as the world holds its breath in anticipation, a chorus of nuclear explosions does not rend the sky. Instead, the clock's hands continue their relentless, meaningless march, unfazed by the significance humans赋予这一时刻。This lack of a cataclysmic event serves as a stark reminder of our own insignificance in the grand cosmic scheme. We are but fleeting observers, witnesses to a cosmic spectacle that unfolds according to its own inscrutable rules. The absence of a nuclear holocaust does not, however, diminish the existential dread that this clock evokes. Its relentless ticking, a constant reminder of its capricious nature, is a stark juxtaposition to the order and predictability we seek in our own lives. It is a symbol of the chaos and uncertainty that lie at the heart of existence, a force that we can neither control nor comprehend. This clock, with its arbitrary movements and lack of discernible purpose, challenges our deeply held belief in causality and order. It forces us to confront the unsettling truth that the universe may not be governed by the rational principles we so desperately cling to. It is a stark reminder of our own limitations, of the vastness of the unknown that surrounds us. The clock's existence raises profound questions about the nature of reality and our place within it. Are we merely puppets in a cosmic play, our actions and decisions inconsequential in the grand scheme of things? Or do we possess the power to shape our own destinies, to impose order on the chaos that surrounds us? These are questions that have vexed philosophers and theologians for centuries, and the clock offers no easy answers. Instead, it stands as a silent sentinel, a constant reminder of the inherent uncertainty and unpredictability of existence. It is a stark symbol of the futility of our attempts to control and understand the vastness of the universe. It is a mirror that reflects back our own insignificance, our fleeting existence in the face of cosmic infinity. The clock's message is both humbling and liberating. It humbles us by reminding us of our limitations, of the vastness of the unknown that surrounds us. But it also liberates us from the burden of certainty, from the need to impose order on a chaotic world. It invites us to embrace the unknown, to accept the inherent uncertainty of existence, and to find beauty in the unpredictable nature of life. It is in this acceptance, in this surrender to the arbitrary and the incomprehensible, that we find true freedom. For it is only when we let go of our need for control and predictability that we can truly appreciate the wonder and beauty of a universe that is infinitely more complex and mysterious than we could ever hope to comprehend.

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Current Movement:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/doomsday-clock-update-globalists-keep-warning-us-that/

[–]Hematomato 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It's weird how The Gateway Pundit doesn't seem to realize that Disease X is hypothetical. It isn't real. It's hypothetical.

[–]SHERIFFJOHNBROWN 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Navigating the Labyrinth of Misinformation: A Critical Examination of The Gateway Pundit's Misrepresentation of Disease X In the vast expanse of information that inundates us daily, it is imperative to maintain a discerning eye, carefully scrutinizing the veracity of the claims presented to us. This task becomes even more crucial when dealing with topics that have significant implications for public health and well-being. The Gateway Pundit, a self-proclaimed news and opinion website, has recently come under fire for its dubious reporting on Disease X, a hypothetical pathogen used in pandemic preparedness exercises. This discussion board response aims to unravel the complexities of this issue, analyzing the website's flawed approach and emphasizing the importance of responsible journalism in safeguarding public trust. Deconstructing the Fabric of Misinformation: The Gateway Pundit's Mishandling of Disease X At the heart of The Gateway Pundit's problematic coverage of Disease X lies a fundamental misunderstanding of the concept itself. The website portrays Disease X as a real and imminent threat, when in reality, it is a hypothetical construct employed by public health experts to simulate potential pandemic scenarios. This mischaracterization not only sows seeds of unwarranted fear and panic among readers but also undermines the credibility of legitimate pandemic preparedness efforts. The Gateway Pundit's erroneous portrayal of Disease X is further compounded by its selective and biased reporting of scientific evidence. The website cherry-picks isolated statements and quotes from scientific studies, twisting their meaning to fit a predetermined narrative. This deceptive tactic creates the illusion of scientific support for its unfounded claims, misleading readers who may not have the expertise to critically evaluate the information presented. Furthermore, The Gateway Pundit engages in fear-mongering tactics, employing sensationalized headlines and alarmist language to capture readers' attention. This approach not only amplifies the website's misleading claims but also contributes to the spread of misinformation, potentially leading to public distrust in scientific institutions and pandemic response measures. The Imperative of Responsible Journalism: Upholding Truth and Accuracy in the Digital Age The Gateway Pundit's irresponsible handling of Disease X highlights the urgent need for responsible journalism in the digital age. In an era where information spreads like wildfire, it is more critical than ever for media outlets to adhere to ethical standards and uphold the principles of truth and accuracy. Responsible journalism demands a commitment to verifying information, seeking multiple sources, and presenting facts in a fair and unbiased manner. It involves respecting the public's right to know and avoiding the dissemination of misleading or unsubstantiated claims. By adhering to these principles, journalists can help foster public trust, promote informed decision-making, and contribute to a healthier and more informed society. Conclusion: Navigating the Information Landscape with Discernment The Gateway Pundit's misrepresentation of Disease X serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us of the importance of critical thinking and media literacy in the digital age. As responsible citizens, it is our duty to carefully evaluate the information we encounter, seeking diverse perspectives and relying on reputable sources. By doing so, we can help combat the spread of misinformation and promote a culture of truth-seeking and informed discourse.

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

what was it during the Cuban Missile Crisis ?

if the lefttards have it closer than that then they need to go to rehab for the perpetually dishonest

[–]HomoTomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Harsh punishments perpetuate violence and hatred, creating societal divisions and negating any potential benefits.

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

or actual penalties for the perps - let peer pressuree do it to those who have sought so much to damage/destroy the US