you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LarrySwinger2 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What does that have to do with it? You're framing it as if it's about whether or not transgendered people can be lesbian. But Out Wellington Inc. took issue with LRA not allowing men on their board. Why would men, or any non-lesbian people, for that matter, be unable to represent LRA or stand up for lesbian rights?

[–]yishengqingwa666 26 insightful - 1 fun26 insightful - 0 fun27 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ONLY WOMEN CAN BE LESBIANS. Get it?

[–]Susiesmum[S] 23 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Why would men, or any non-lesbian people, for that matter, be unable to represent LRA or stand up for lesbian rights?

You don't belong in every group you want to be in. I'm sorry that hurts your feelings but your opinion of lesbian exclusivity is irrelevant.

[–]Zodiac_Killer 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Anyone can be a lesbian. We're in clown world where anyone can be anything, bigot.

[–]LarrySwinger2 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was simply noting that this is why the LRA was banned from that event, at least as far as is clear from the linked articles themselves.