you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (40 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (15 children)

    Are you ever able to discuss anything without listing links to liberal nonsense?

    [–]socks-the-nigger 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (14 children)

    No

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

    I knew it!

    [–][deleted]  (12 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]MightyMorphinFaggot 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

      Yeh, you're the master of bullshit.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

        Lies can be told on both sides of the table...Biatch. 😎

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

        Coverups are not that difficult to understand, Swarzenigga.

        [–][deleted]  (6 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

          Naive much? If it were up to you, there would never be any discussion or any investigation into any remote possibility of a connection between vaccine safety and unexpected deaths because you are so defensive of the vaccine that you would sacrifice being reasonable and logical to protect the reputation of big pharma. Newsflash, big pharma doesn't give a shit about you, only your money. You'd prefer to shut down discussion and go with the narrative despite any questions raised about safety. What if research found a specific group were a high risk of heart attacks and could avoid the risk once identified? Would you care, or would you pressure them to get vaccinated anyway even if they die so you can blame anti-vaxxers?

          [–][deleted]  (4 children)

          [deleted]

            [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

            A COVID jab is not an investigation.

            No long term data has been collected.

            No sufficient testing has been conducted.

            Increase in miscarriage data, baby death data, and heart attacks in the young are being brushed off as perfectly normal.

            Pfizer has failed to produce much of its document data pertaining to testing or effectiveness prior to, or following public release.

            There has been an active campaign to silence anyone who has had severe side effects from the jab.

            There has been an active campaign to discredit the VAERS reports of side effects.

            Normally, when a vaccine has any major risk of fatalities, it is withdrawn promptly. Only J&J withdrew theirs due to clotting problems.

            There is evidence that Pfizer in particular has been very shady about vaccines from the beginning.

            MSM will say anything to ensure they keep their advertising revenue from pharmaceutical companies.

            Sufficient evidence of general safety in the short term is pretty clear. But that's not the point. If it isn't safe for some, we need to know. If it has killed people and the data was known, someone needs to be held accountable. If risk is known and preventable but encouraged anyway, someone needs to be held accountable.

            If you comply with big pharma regardless of anything they say that contradicts actual evidence of harm, then you are no more than a puppet. In which case I'd ask, are you bending over for free, or are they paying you?

            [–]BISH 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (18 children)

            There is no connection between the COVID vaccine and those deaths.

            Prior to 2021, people didn't die "suddenly".

            [–][deleted]  (16 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]BISH 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

              There was always a cause of death.

              Way back in the day when autopsies were performed.

              [–][deleted]  (14 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]BISH 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

                Cheap words.

                Reality check: They stopped doing autopsies for died suddenly.

                [–][deleted]  (12 children)

                [deleted]

                  [–]BISH 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

                  Nope. This is really dumb.

                  Good luck finding any bullshit links to defend your foolish autopsy narrative.

                  It's a global cover-up beyond comprehension.

                  [–][deleted]  (10 children)

                  [deleted]

                    [–]BISH 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

                    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711979/

                    You cite a 2017 NIH paper?

                    The NIH is one of the perpetrators. Stupid.

                    Like I said. Good luck.

                    [–]Bigs 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                    I kept telling you peeps, don't share that shit, cos they mixed in earlier deaths and fainting. So now you look a dick for sharing it, while damaging the entire concept of people dying suddenly.

                    Well done.

                    "You are doing that too much. try again in 1 minute" Oh fuck me, I'm on Reddit?

                    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

                    Defensive much?

                    $3 million. I wonder how many BILLION$ Pfizer and the corporatocracy shills make?

                    Nay saying by repeating propaganda from the enemy doesn't hold water.

                    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

                    [deleted]

                      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                      ^ socks the nigger gammon

                      [–]Bigs 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                      LOL, this movie was indeed designed to be debunked, and here you are, with your BBC links n shit.

                      This folks, is exactly why I told y'all to NOT share that shit.