all 22 comments

[–]happysmash27 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Um, no, not even close. A huge portion of the LGBTQ and left-wing community currently HATE the idea of pedophiles being included with LGBTQ. I personally see pedophilia as a very problematic paraphilia, similar to an orientation but not quite the same, that one shouldn't be intrinsically hated for having as long as they don't abuse any actual children, but usually, particularly online, most organisation-approved leftists do not. I think that fictional images of child pornography that don't include any real children are fine, because they don't actually harm anyone and even more so, because fiction is protected under free speech, but even suggesting this relatively benign idea in certain left-wing communities (/r/Anarchism and Raddle, specifically) has gotten me shunned and banned to the point of me being suicidal, despite not even getting close to supporting the legalisation of rape of children (which I strongly oppose), even if this shunning may have been part of a Delphi Technique. For this reason I think it is highly unlikely that any powerful leftist/LGBTQ organisation pushes this at all. On the contrary, they appear to push the exact opposite viewpoint.

I went through hell because of expressing my viewpoint in the more censored left-wing communities, so saying that these communities support this extreme is highly contradictory to my observations.

[–]PM-HENTAI 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

this looks very much like a left wing meme

[–]LordGhoul 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's a fantasy strawman of the liberal left if I've ever seen one. Pedos have tried for many years to become part of the lgbt+ community and make reasons up to try and make it legal (example shown in South Park episode from before 2000, "Cartman joins NAMBLA") but the lgbt+ community despises them. Nobody actually wants what this meme says except for the actual pedophiles. Adults can consent but children can't because they are simply too young.

Additionally, the lgbt community doesn't force children into hormones or anything, in fact it's illegal for underage kids to start hormones. If a child claims to want to be the opposite sex or isn't sure they have the possibility to get puberty blockers (simply blocks some of their sexual hormones from sending them into puberty for a while) just to give them more thinking time before their natural hormones take their decision for them. Once they are of age then they can decide for themselves if they want to take hormones or not. Not to mention the entire process isn't like going into the store and buying yourself a pack of testosterone. There's therapy and years of waiting time involved. That they want to give children hormones is an utterly absurd misconception.

[–]PM-HENTAI 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I meant the huge wall of text is what you'd expect on a left wing meme. This format in particular usually has no more than a short sentence

It would also be a lot more accurate if it was a Jew rather than lgbt, because they run the media which pushes all of this.

[–]Adolf_Hitler 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why do you think that puberty blockers aren't going to alter how a person develops, including their self concept? How come this option is being pushed with so little research behind it? You're disrupting one of the most important steps in human development without decades of science to back it up.

[–]HopeThatHalps 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

tl,dr

[–][deleted]  (20 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Not parasites, but they can't make children so that's good for elite agenda.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      wat? Gays can not reproduce, so how can they reproduce through gay pedophilia? Makes zero sense. Though, most homosexuals have a normal gay sex life, and are nice people, there's a subset of the homosexual population that sexually abuses young boys and girls at a frequency that most people can not even comprehend.

      Many LGBT+ individuals support Alfred C. Kinsey's work. We had many pro-nambla bands at a specific venue I worked at. Some of their song lyrics were horrid. I wanted to hide in the corner and cry. I could not imagine what they do in private, though I figured a large majority of the members were sexually abused in the past. Moreover, an example of Kinsey's idealogy is the following quote by him; the leader of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) in 1981.

      "Gay liberationists in general, and boy-lovers in particular, should know Kinsey's work and hold it dear.... implicit in Kinsey is the struggle we fight today.1" North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) 1981

      Most people are fine with transgenders, gay people, etc. I am, I have no beef with what they find most natural or what they do in private. However, it seems most gay activists dismiss concerns of child sexual abuse–in part, by strenuously insisting that there is no connection between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of children.

      That being said sexual abuse of boys appears to be common, underreported, underrecognized, and undertreated. Homosexual males molest boy victims far more often than heterosexual males molest girl victims. Psychologist Eugene Abel reported homosexuals,

      "sexually molest young boys with an incidence that is occurring from five times greater than the molestation of girls."


      The rate of homosexual versus heterosexual child sexual abuse is staggering. 150.2 boys abused per male homosexual offender finds no equal (yet) in heterosexual violations of 19.8 girls.

      Nonincarcerated child molesters admitted to from 23.4 to 281.7 acts per offender....whose targets were males" (Abel et. al., at 32-50. 44, 48)."37

      The 1991, US Population, Statistical Abstracts data are compared to the accepted child sex abuse data.

      1-2 million homosexual men, who comprise a very small percentage of the male population, managed to sexually abuse 6 to 8 million boys under the age of 18. Approximately the same number of girls were abused during the same time frame. However, it took 86-88 million heterosexual men to prey on that number of girls. Again, the data demonstrate that the rate of homosexual molestation of boys greatly outstrips the rate of heterosexual molestation of girls.


      Since 100% of homosexual males do not sexually assault boys, and as you and I know, the majority are probably nice people: a vast subset of this highly cohesive population commits multiple, repeated child sex offenses. And I think I've worked among them. The homosexual population has been internationally identified in France, England and the USA as between 1% and 3% (in a range of 1.5% to 2%).38

      This data illustrates that 2% homosexual population harbors a vast pederast boy abuse subculture, a public health problem of immense proportions that has been ignored.

      Scroll down to the exerpt on Hunter S. Thompson, who talked openly about pedo cults and very likely could have been on of them...

      https://steemit.com/news/@whitedeer9217/the-body-and-ritual-abuse-pt-1-comparing-gurdjieff-s-fourth-way-maria-abramovic-s-method

      And while many homosexuals may not seek young sexual partners, the evidence indicates that disproportionate numbers of gay men seek adolescent males or boys as sexual partners or twinks as the trans punk bands like to call them. And yes, the majority of child molestation cases are heterosexual in nature. While this is correct in terms of absolute numbers, this argument ignores the fact that homosexuals comprise only a very small percentage of the population.

      Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men.

      • Significant numbers of victims are males: Up to one-third of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys (as opposed to girls).
      • The 10 percent fallacy: Studies indicate that, contrary to the inaccurate but widely accepted claims of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey, homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population. As I mentioned before Kinsey is a very shady fella.

      • Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children.

      • Some homosexual activists defend the historic connection between homosexuality and pedophilia: Such activists consider the defense of “boy-lovers” to be a legitimate gay rights issue.

      • Pedophile themes abound in homosexual literary culture: Gay fiction as well as serious academic treatises promote “intergenerational intimacy.”

      I'd also look into the percentage of sexual partners of homosexuals vs. heterosexuals. The data also shows a disparity of immense proportions.

      Lastly, statistics documenting transgender people's experience of sexual violence indicate shockingly high levels of sexual abuse and assault. One in two transgender individuals are sexually abused or assaulted at some point in their lives.1 Some reports estimate that transgender survivors may experience rates of sexual assault up to 66 percent, often coupled with physical assaults or abuse.2 This indicates that the majority of transgender individuals are living with the aftermath of trauma and the fear of possible repeat victimization.

      https://www.ovc.gov/pubs/forge/sexual_notes.html#_edn2

      https://www.ovc.gov/pubs/forge/sexual_notes.html#_edn1

      [–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

      How are they parasites when they typically have fairly high income?

      So people who are sterile or old are also parasites in your view?

      [–][deleted]  (15 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

        ...said the person calling others parasites simply for who they choose to love. Sounds pretty self-centered to me, tbh

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

        Gay people aren't parasites just because their sexual choices, the LGBT activism become them parasites

        [–]magnora7 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

        So really you hate activists, not gay people

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        I hate their ideas, i don't hate them as persons

        [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        Why, though? I think homosexuality is immoral and not biologically acceptable but people are gay and can be gay. I love all people no matter what. The elite who push trans and gay agenda on young people through film and internet are the enemies of humanity.

        [–]slabgreen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        "not biologically acceptable" explain.

        Also, username checks out.

        [–]send_nasty_stuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        LGBTQ activist are 9 times out of 10 in favor of abortion, socialism, NWO, anti natalism, and anti western policies like immigration and cultural Marxism. Which is why they are promoted by the corporate oligarchs in the first place. They are the useful idiots Yuri Bezmenov warned us about. Sexual liberation is a form of control. E. Michael Jones's Libido Dominadi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control goes into this in detail.

        If you don't have time to read it here's an interview.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3lZiC2AWas

        [–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Eh, I'd say more like 6 out of 10. How many gay people do you know that aren't LGBT activists? There are a lot out there, you probably just don't interact with them because they keep to themselves.

        [–]send_nasty_stuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        6 out of 10 is enough to destroy the west.

        Give this a read if you get a chance.

        https://evolutionistx.wordpress.com/2018/12/08/an-open-letter-to-liberals-and-centrists/

        [–][deleted]  (5 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]magnora7 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

          So what? There are many more ways to contribute to the world than having children... if that's what you believe, then you must think Central Africa and Afghanistan are super great places: https://www.targetmap.com/ThumbnailsReports/7704_THUMB_IPAD.jpg

          [–]slabgreen 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          I second this. Human evolution isn't just genetic. A gay person may not pass on their genes (and this could change soon, given scientific advances), but they can pass on their labor and ideas. In this day and age it's rather absurd to suggest that having children is the only, or even the most significant, way to impact society.

          Also, can we all just take a moment to appreciate how responsible an admin u/magnora7 is?

          [–]PM-HENTAI 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          to be fair, there is a distinction to be made between raising a few kids in the first world(which has a deficit of new children) and spitting out 8 children you cant possibly afford to raise.

          gays aren't inherently parasitical, there are other groups you can give that title but little sense is being made here

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)

          [deleted]

            [–]slabgreen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            What?