Oops! Moderna Scientists Now Warn mRNA Vaccines Carry Toxicity Risks

submitted by PanzersGhost from (vigilantnews.com)

all 11 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

A major challenge now is how to efficiently de-risk potential toxicities associated with mRNA technology

The mark of the beast will be called the "cure" to the kill-shot. But beware of the deceivers who are following an evil plan.

[–]Jiminy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I remember seeing "pine tea" being touted as a cure for long vaccine symptoms. Some also said it would keep people from shedding the vaccine. I immediately saw it as symbolism from the elites. Pine tea = pineal gland. Third eye.

[–]In-the-clouds 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You could be right. The pineal gland is in the forehead. The mark of the beast will be in the right hand or in the forehead. When you see the abomination of desolation sitting in the place where he does not belong, then you know that it is the end.

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Mark-13-14/

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The gospel (good spell) of Mark (of the beast). Desolation means desolate, lack of anything. Deserted. Empty. Lack of sacrifices. Mark described it as giving sacrifices to pagan gods instead of the Jewish one. Romans had taken over the temple and dedicated it to Zeus. Jesus tho of course said you don't have to offer sacrifices to either, he sacrificed himself. Mark never met Jesus so didn't know this. The mark of the beast is Mark. Matthew and Luke copied Mark. We should just go by Jesus's words.

[–]In-the-clouds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

There is one more gospel: the book of John. Why did you spare John from your attack?

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The other three are called synoptic gospels, as they have a lot of the same material. Of course all this info comes from the same source, Jesus, and his movement. But Luke and Matthew mainly just copied Mark. John is different. If you read John it's mostly positive good things. The words and acts of Jesus. Jesus's teachings are different in a lot of ways. How can this be.

Where do they get the names? John was an apostle. Was it actually written by him, maybe not literally but it's likely he told his stories orally and they got passed around as John's story and then written down. John was the disciple whom Jesus loved. What did that mean? Probably just meant he was Jesus's best friend. Close confidant. One who really knew Jesus and could describe his words and acts best.

When I was younger reading Gospel of John is what really made me realize the goodness of Jesus.

[–]In-the-clouds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

If you desire what is good, now that you are older you would continue to listen to him instead of attacking his disciples Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Jesus is the Lord and your only hope of salvation.

John was the disciple whom Jesus loved. What did that mean?

John had the faith and love of a child toward his Father. (Jesus was the physical manifestation of the Father of spirits.)

Jesus loves every soul equally: to infinity. It is the man that varies in his love. Some men hate Jesus, some love a little, some love much. John loved much.

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think we have to be careful of trusting the Bible completely. There are contradictions like the thing I mentioned with Mark and sacrifices. Bible, babble, Babylon. The contradictions could just come from mistranslations. Spoke in Aramaic, written down in greek then Latin then English. King James Bible written by Francis Bacon. And yet the true words of Jesus are in there. In reading John I can't find contradictions, I can't find negativity or defeatism. John seems to be attacked and criticized the most. They say he's really mary Magdalene or Jesus gay lover. I think they hate it because it's so positive. I don't know any of this for sure, it is faith when it comes down to it. But there's also a lot of facts and logic to go by.

[–]In-the-clouds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know any of this for sure

Good point.... and you are likely wrong about all or most of what you say about God's word. So to anyone reading, beware. If anyone has questions with a sincere desire for truth, pray directly to Jesus Christ (not Jiminy Crickets) and ask him.

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Could you consider that you might be wrong, any of us could. I suggest to you to not trust me, go read the Gospel of John.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

just like the canceled-on-twitter people said, funny thing