you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HegeMoney 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

The scientific community has yet to demonstrably prove that the SARS COV-2 is a new virus. The "virus" was identified as soon as it appeared, which is impossibly fast.
The evidence cannot be gathered, interpreted, and peer reviewed in 6 months.
It's close to impossible.
Improbable at best, but this analysis was never actually be performed.

They have never demonstrably shown that the original SARS is a new and unique "virus". The alleged predecessor.

The scientific community isn't testing for the actual virus. They are testing for human antibodies.

There may be 30 similar antibodies that were previously unidentified (or whatever), but this is not at all the same as identifing different viral strains.

This virus is the new method of state terrorism.
It's a Boogeyman that's everywhere and growing.

Except you can't see it, or prove it does, or doesn't exist. (FYI: It doesn't exist.)

This is similar to the numerous FBI reports of Al Qaeda terror cells, etc.
It's all smoke and mirrors that attempt to legitimate a Boogeyman that hasn't been proven to exist.

The US and company created:

  • Al CIAeda to fight in Afghanistan, and blame for 9/11 false flag.
  • ISIS to fight the Iraqi and Syrian military. The State Dept bought all of the Toyota truck ISIS drove for the television terror clips
  • The Wuhan "virus research". Naturally funded by the US and CDC (a private corporation), etc.

You can be just as certain it's fake, because these scoundrels would never release a disease that would put them at risk.

They will frighten the public into believing the building is burning, and then give everyone a noose to lower them to "safety".

It's the new excuse for surveillance and control.

We've all been duped.

Don't believe the hype.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I don' believe anything in this topic so far. I know how they do test because there is no other way so far, afaik.

Maybe even humane genetics do play a role bc. there are people that test positive in both tests and still don't show any symptoms.

Then there are other people who show completely different symptoms like loss of flavour or smell and cardiovascular problems and such.

I just posted this, since i cited it so often and couldn't find the link at these points in time.

I stopped to believe anything from the virologists whose papers i had to read, because i don't believe in their methods at this point in time.

On the other hand there is stuff like this: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-70812-6 .

[–]HegeMoney 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don' believe anything in this topic so far.

You're ahead of +80% of the public with this statement alone. IMHO.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I think all the time about V for Vendetta. Not only is the regular plot super relevant, but I see another plot coming too. We are in a V for Vendetta situation, but one where V is a patsy and tricks us into "overthrowing" the corrupt elite. I see this as a possibility, only if enough people wake up and stand up together under a common banner. NOT BLM. That's some divisive shit.

[–]HegeMoney 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed.

Although I think "V" volunteered to save humanity.

Patsy's are set up to fail.