you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Wasteak 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Science isn't about yea or nay, it's about facts.

Religions are about yea or nay.

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Not actually true. That is what you have been taught by anti religion propagandists in order to delegitimize religion and create a false sense of legitimacy for science.

In practice science is about power and control. That is why we are constantly being forced to do things based on scientific arguments that is blatantly illogical and against our best interests. Like the covid jabs, lockdowns, etc. and like the carbon credit tyranny they are trying to implement based on climate change alarmism.

Sciencism is a religion just like any other and is built on appeal to authority.

[–]Wasteak 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're mixing politics and science, both are different things. When politics want to convince people of something they will say "scientists proved it", whether it's true or not.

Science isn't a religion, it's about making theories and finding facts to support it.

Religions don't have any factual proof.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no longer ANY authoritative science being done. We live in the new dark ages. Everything has been coopted by power and corrupted to push their political agenda. Psychologists are all going along with the antiscientific claim that transgenderism is not a mental illness. The entire academic field lies about IQ and racial differences. They claim it is for anti racism, but then turn around and push racist anti white propaganda. Climate change has become a tool to push oppressive policies, destroy family farms, and consolidate power in the few hands that already have the most power.

I am not the one mixing politics and science. No one follows the scientific method. And no does any science devoid of political consideration.

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

True.... And those that try to use the scientific method on the idea of evolution find that it is not reproducible nor repeatable. So, evolution is a religion.

[–]westway9 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

lol. *citation missing.

[–]In-the-clouds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Your statement applies to yourself, and the OP, as you cited nothing to substantiate your claims. Show us the scientific experiments that repeats the process of evolution in a lab, if you can.

[–]westway9 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No the burden of proof is on the accuser. I am not claiming evolution is true or false, but I can plainly see that above OP's argument is unsupported. That's his problem to deal with.

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am not accusing anyone. I said evolution is not reproducible nor repeatable. It's not scientifically proven. How could I give citations to evidence that does not exist? If you want me to cite something about the scientific method, I can do that.

[–]Wasteak 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It is reproductible and repeatable.

Take the flu virus for example, it evolves each year. An easy to understand paper on that

But I'm pretty sure that whatever I throw at you you will say it's fake, and that fossils aren't real stuff.

[–]In-the-clouds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The flu.... that's out of style. The virus money-making fad over the past several years has been COVID. Are you going to trust what the paid scientists and shills say about COVID? It evolved all on its own, right? From a bat in a wet market? And it began its creation by itself.... not in a lab? Of course the evil side wants us to believe in evolution.

If a virus were designed in a lab, that is not proof of evolution, but intelligent creation. God's adversary is very intelligent, but evil, using his power to steal, kill, and destroy. But God, our Creator, is greater.

If you want to respond, you can have the last word on this thread, because it's not worth arguing science falsely so-called if you have already made up your mind to reject your God and Creator. I'm sorry for you, though, and hope you reconsider the truth and break free from the adversary's lies. I thank the Lord that he warned me ahead of time, so I was not deceived, and I still have my good health.