Am I reading this data correct? 18.4% of unvaxed represent 19.3% of hospitalizations? So statistically speaking, the vaccine did nothing to prevent hospitalizations?

submitted by HiddenFox from (i.imgur.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zyxzevn 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

More info:

The jabs are even showing negative effectiveness, up to -100%.

That is also logical, because it attacks your immune system in an effort to trigger antibodies. Antibodies that are only specialized against the spike proteins of a variant that does no longer exists. And these antibodies do not work against airway diseases (you need a different kind).

These spike proteins also attack your immune system cells, and the mRNA uses artificial codes to disable the immune system. The DNA and mRNA in the cells also trigger auto-immune reactions and stay more than 60 days. In autopsies we see that the immune system cells can often not find the these cells, and cause an inflammation.

Sources:

This negative efficacy was also clear in the trials. They just tested the groups differently, because they were not blinded for the researchers.
The British medical journal was the first to officially write about the problems with the trials in 2020. Now we know it is all based on fraud.

Autopsies with Arne Burkardt

Pathology Conference - Pathology of v deaths and v injuries Video - translated to english

About the wrong antibodies
IgM, IgG, IgA

Data about the negative -106% was found in the UK data.
link

Note: the agencies are very unhappy with the results. So they fraud the data. Here is proof of some of that fraud:
Proof of statistical sieves in v data
According to the jab makes you up 60% less likely to get a car accident.

Overview with many other links:
How the experiments cause damage by design

(I posted this on reddit and this fits here too)

[–]HenryGeorgeOfficial 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Oof someone doesn't know the difference between correlation and causation. Vaccinated people dying less from car accidents could have totally reasonable explanations. For example, maybe people who get vaccines are smarter than people who don't. Therefore they would be more likely to drive smarter too. Therefore they would be less likely to die.

A correlation between between COVID vaccines and car deaths is not evidence of data manipulation. It also isn't evidence that the vaccine causes anything related to driving. It's just a correlation. There are many other possible causal explanations.

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

You did not check the links again.

[–]HenryGeorgeOfficial 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I did.