Am I reading this data correct? 18.4% of unvaxed represent 19.3% of hospitalizations? So statistically speaking, the vaccine did nothing to prevent hospitalizations?

submitted by HiddenFox from (i.imgur.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 18 insightful - 6 fun18 insightful - 5 fun19 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

Sounds about right given what I know.

And then consider the fact that it takes 2 weeks to be considered "vaccinated" after the vaccine. So if someone is immediately injured by the vaccine, they'll be recorded as an unvaccinated hospitalization.

Furthermore, there is a lot of pressure in the medical community to hide and downplay the negative effects these mRNA shots are having, because their medical licenses often depend on it. Which is ridiculous, because it pits their medical license against the hippocratic oath, which is a crime against humanity imo.

So once you consider these further additional points, it probably is not only doing nothing, but might very well be causing worse outcomes on average. The fact this is being covered up and overlooked is a crime against humanity, people are being killed and permanently injured over this.

[–]HenryGeorgeOfficial 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Lmao no, it is simpson's paradox. Here is a 3 minute video for you if you have the attention span for it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVRfBhy5vGI

The younger people are less vaccinated but also at a lower risk than the elderly who are more vaccinated. Therefore you get a positive correlation between "vaccine" and "hospitalization" even though controlling for age, it is obvious that vaccines reduce hospitalization risk for every age group. In short, you and every commenter who agrees with you is confusing correlation with causation, which is a like a grade 5 mistake.