SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?

submitted by JasonCarswell from (self.AskSaidIt)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

This is about more than just my comfort. Among many reasons, this is also about not alienating new users who are truth-seekers and free-thinkers but don't give a shit about trolling culture found anywhere else. For example, it seems like Popper was trying to fuck up my efforts to bring my real-life Windsor resistance friends to this platform.

Other users have been banned an not returned. Maybe they deserved it maybe they didn't. Certainly most of them did. If and when they return, it's obvious who the real trouble makers are as they tend to let loose. Some have quietly returned and been civil, because they never really deserved it. If we did ban socks and ActuallyNot and they did return we might see their true essence, if it wasn't already obvious.

[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

You make an excellent point. I vote yes then if this is a democracy. We see their true essence, and a few other's true essence as well.

You are right about new users being turned off by them, especially I think if they would be new users worth having around.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    Re-read what you typed. I obviously DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE SAYIN. You don't even know what you're sayin