Users of Saidit: Should subs that don't violate the rules be removed from s/all by the admins?

submitted by Dragonerne from (self.AskSaidIt)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Should subs that don't violate the rules be removed from s/all by the admins?

Your question is incomplete.

IFIFY:

Should large sub communities that don't violate the rules be removed from /s/All by the admins in order to not dominate /s/All and change then character and nature of SaidIt?

[–]crackerjack 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

the /new page is infected with massive voter fraud. this thread shows plainly that censorship is the norm.

i waste my time here because i have time to waste.

fuck reddit and double fuck saidit.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

the /new page is infected with massive voter fraud.

It's the front-page, not new. New just shows the latest posts in no particular order, but the front-page sorts them by votes — which are fraudulent, as you said.

[–]crackerjack 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I always tell the truth, even when I lie. ~Tony Montana