you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Think <victim of shill harassment>

I like it when I see this opening rebuttal, because it means someone has socks on the ropes, and socks is using his note cards.

Game over. This amateur crap doesn't work here.

socks got his ass handed to him, again.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

What is this? An argument? Well, it's a start. What you describe is a boxing match and additional name calling. Seems you still have "no skin in the game' so to speak. You can do better, Tom, I hope.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Think Bob

What is this? An argument?

Nope.

It's a low-budget opener from an unoriginal shill.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Contribute or don't contribute, pussy

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I can't believe the sheer volume of discussion dedicated to you.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

IKD

Seems that 3 anti-vaxxers are currently smitten. I try to inspire them to think of counter-arguments; not that this is working....

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Contribute or don't contribute, pussy

.

What is this? An argument?