My Top Smoking Guns for Ancient Technology [JahannaJames]

submitted by zyxzevn from youtube.com

all 2 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]zyxzevn[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why are ancient objects so much more technologically advanced than those from the later generations?

Personally I still like the geopolymers hypothesis, but we first need to replicate the chemical process behind that.
see: http://geopolymer.org

Good evidence for geopolymers are statues that were demolished by Isis and were shown to be like cement containing smaller rocks inside them.
Additionally sometimes you can see damage on many of the stonework, showing the inside. The inside always seems very different and eroded. As if the inside was made of a different material. Seems like stone and cement/concrete to me, which was then covered with shiny finishing material.
A bit like our pottery/china is baked in ovens to harden, and then covered and baked with glazing to make it shiny.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe Egypt was an Indian colony created to control the Suez Canal. Since Indians had access to intelligence boosting techniques, their system of education may seem alien to us. I'm bad at remembering dates, but it should be the period from before the Arian migration and the climate change crisis that weakened the locals.