Why would I proclaim to deny the fact that the stories in both the old and new treatments are vile when they are? I hold a very low opinion of all religion, religious folk, religious figures, religious texts and all who are featured in them. They were vile then and they are vile now, as modern progressives are vile. You cannot claim they were not vile before due to being progressive only to vilify modern progressives for the same ideological nonsense. Religion is vile, and it is not merely my personal opinion but a general understanding that religion is, and has been a constant cause of harm to individuals, groups, nations and every person who comes in contact with them. There may be some positive outcomes as a byproduct of religion but this is not the rule.