BRAPking

Those are all good questions. But if the driver who was defending himself shot Garett for no reason, why was he released? Sure they're still investigating, but they would hold him if this shooting was suspicious. Could it be that there's additional evidence that only law enforcement has at this time? I would bet there is.

If he was already pointing his gun then how did that guy have time to draw it, aim, and fire it without the guy who already had a gun pointed having time to fire back?

I think it's more like he had it ready and low (as seen in that grainy photo - not aiming it, but up against his shoulder and down at 45 degrees, ready to fire) then may have pointed it. The driver probably had his firearm ready since he was already being harassed by the mass of angry people before Garrett ran up to the driver's window. Even if Garett hadn't pointed it directly at the driver, him holding it up to his shoulder and making any sort of movement could have been interpreted as such in the chaos of the angry mob who swarmed the car. At this point, it's already justified self-defense, no direct pointing required (yet still may have occurred)

He died because a crowd of people decided that cars aren't allowed on the road they claimed for themselves. They aggressively swarmed the car in a split second after he already stopped (to avoid hitting anyone) and then a guy with a gun ran up looking like he could shoot. Stupidity was the real killer.